Hi, On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm> > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Though you haven't made any announcement, it seems like the old > > stonithd is removed from Pacemaker 1.1 and replaced by a brand > > new stonith daemon. That's most probably the way to go, but I'm > > worried because the new code didn't see much field testing. > > Which is why we're not pushing it as a stable release yet... > Though I have spent quite some time testing it myself, both manually > and via cts. > > The code has already been through a number of iterations, I'm quite > confident in it.
I somehow learned never to be confident until the code went out and has actually been used by others, not only me :) > > Is there a way to keep the old stonithd and allow users to choose > > which stonith daemon to use at runtime? > > Nope. People concerned by this should continue using 1.0 (which will > remain the current "frozen" stable series until 1.2 comes out) and > wait until others report its ok. That unfortunately leaves SLES11SP1 in an awkward situation, since it seems like we'll use v1.1. Cheers, Dejan > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list > Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
