Re: [Pacemaker] possible node status

2014-01-09 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2014-01-08T23:31:03, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > > What part of the stack are you asking about? Those that can show in the > > CIB, that crm_mon shows, that pengine computes ...? > That in the CIB and/or those that crm_mon reports. Basically that states that > the monitoring would like to

Re: [Pacemaker] possible node status

2014-01-08 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014, 23:09:40 schrieben Sie: > On 2014-01-08T22:30:29, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what are fro mthe pacemaker point of view all possible node status'? > > > > online|standby|offline|... > > > > Any future extensions planned? > > What part of the stack

Re: [Pacemaker] possible node status

2014-01-08 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2014-01-08T22:30:29, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Hi, > > what are fro mthe pacemaker point of view all possible node status'? > > online|standby|offline|... > > Any future extensions planned? What part of the stack are you asking about? Those that can show in the CIB, that crm_mon shows

Re: [Pacemaker] possible node status

2014-01-08 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 9 Jan 2014, at 8:30 am, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > Hi, > > what are fro mthe pacemaker point of view all possible node status'? > > online|standby|offline|... failed too iirc. crm_mon.c would know for sure > > Any future extensions planned? not that i know of > > Thanks for any fe

[Pacemaker] possible node status

2014-01-08 Thread Michael Schwartzkopff
Hi, what are fro mthe pacemaker point of view all possible node status'? online|standby|offline|... Any future extensions planned? Thanks for any feedback. Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Michael Schwartzkopff -- [*] sys4 AG http://sys4.de, +49 (89) 30 90 46 64, +49 (162) 165 0044 Franziskanerstr