Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-10-03 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 03.10.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>  wrote: >>> >>> 03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> [...] >>> >>> If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership c

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-10-03 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
03.10.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [...] If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or release i

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-10-03 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > [...] > If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect > new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or > release it) on a non-quorate pa

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-10-02 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
03.10.2011 04:41, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [...] If pacemaker fully finish processing of one membership change - elect new DC on a quorate partition, and do not try to take over dc role (or release it) on a non-quorate partition if quorate one exists, that problem could be gone. >>

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-10-02 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> [snip] > I agree with Jiaju > (https://lists.linux-foundation.org/p

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-28 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi, 27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [snip] > All the more reason to start using the stonith api directly. > I was playing around list night with the dlm_controld.pcmk code: > > https://github.com/beekhof/dlm/commit/9f890a36f6844c2a0567aea0a0e29cc47b01b787 Doesn't seem to apply to 3.0.

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-27 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
27.09.2011 10:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> [snip] I agree with Jiaju (https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016713.html), that could be

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-27 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > [snip] >>> I agree with Jiaju >>> (https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016713.html), >>> that could be solely pacemaker problem, because it probably sh

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-27 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
27.09.2011 08:59, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [snip] >> I agree with Jiaju >> (https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016713.html), >> that could be solely pacemaker problem, because it probably should >> originate fencing itself is such situation I think. >>>

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 26.09.2011 11:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > [snip] >>> Regardless, for 1.1.6 the dlm would be better off making a call like:           rc = st->cmds->fence(st, st_opts, target, "reboot", 120); from fencing/adm

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-26 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
26.09.2011 11:16, Andrew Beekhof wrote: [snip] >> >>> >>> Regardless, for 1.1.6 the dlm would be better off making a call like: >>> >>> rc = st->cmds->fence(st, st_opts, target, "reboot", 120); >>> >>> from fencing/admin.c >>> >>> That would talk directly to the fencing daemon, bypassing

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > 26.09.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, hi all, >>> >>> I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in >>> https://www.redhat.c

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-26 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi Andrew, 26.09.2011 10:10, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> Hi Andrew, hi all, >> >> I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-August/msg00133.html >> and in the threa

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-26 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > Hi Andrew, hi all, > > I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in > https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-August/msg00133.html > and in the thread starting from > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail

[Pacemaker] pacemaker/dlm problems

2011-09-06 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
Hi Andrew, hi all, I'm further investigating dlm lockspace hangs I described in https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2011-August/msg00133.html and in the thread starting from https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/openais/2011-September/016701.html . What I described there is setup