On 25/05/2013, at 2:15 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 05/24/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>> Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
>> openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
>> channels mixed up, it's been a while
>>
>> @#linux-clust
Hahaha. Digmer you know you're a total advocate of RH and RH based
products ;).
Lars, I remember the amazing support SE had for AIS even going back to
1.1.x. If I recall correctly I used some of the patches written by
you? To get OCFS2 dlm and configfs running with pacemaker+cman hybrid
cluster
On 05/24/2013 01:30 PM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2013-05-24T12:15:04, Digimer wrote:
Nope. Until RHEL 5, openais was the communication layer of the cluster.
However, the full AIS API was deemed "overkill" for what HA clustering
needed, so corosync was created for RHEL 6 as a stripped-down,
On 2013-05-24T12:15:04, Digimer wrote:
> Nope. Until RHEL 5, openais was the communication layer of the cluster.
> However, the full AIS API was deemed "overkill" for what HA clustering
> needed, so corosync was created for RHEL 6 as a stripped-down, HA focused
> version of openais. In turn, open
On 2013-05-24T09:36:21, Nick Khamis wrote:
> include them here if you can Florian, can we do an active/active OCFS2 +
> fs/dlm without
> the cman pleasantries.
If you're looking for OCFS2, that works just fine on SLE HA. And it is
very stable.
It's not yet working on the most recent corosync 2.
On 05/24/2013 11:24 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
channels mixed up, it's been a while
@#linux-cluster and #linux-ha: Will do.
Ninus Khamis (PhD)
PS Sorry for
Was there not a time where corosync was a subset of OpenAIS? Namely,
openais support for active/active and passive/active? I might have my
channels mixed up, it's been a while
@#linux-cluster and #linux-ha: Will do.
Ninus Khamis (PhD)
PS Sorry for the hijack
On 05/24/2013 10:52 AM, Nick Khamis wrote:
Digmer,
It's been a while since i've visited your well written how-to blogs
however, can you direct me to your latest and greatest active/active
tutorials. I know you like cman, but I can just skip those parts for
and OpenAIS + Pacemaker setup.
If you
Digmer,
It's been a while since i've visited your well written how-to blogs
however, can you direct me to your latest and greatest active/active
tutorials. I know you like cman, but I can just skip those parts for
and OpenAIS + Pacemaker setup.
If you have an OpenAIS + Pacemaker tutorial, that wo
On 05/24/2013 08:26 AM, Florian Crouzat wrote:
Le 24/05/2013 04:15, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:27 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie
Le 24/05/2013 15:36, Nick Khamis a écrit :
We are looking to put something together but
don't wan't to use cman for certain things and pacemaker for other. This
will be strictly and active/active using OpenAIS and pacemaker. Has that
been decoupled, stable and sorted out?
I don't have the sli
+1 for quorum in 2 node = pointless. Sorry to chime in here however, I
could not help the "noob question" subject line since
I have a kind of noob question myself.
Have not setup a OpenAIS + pacemaker/corosync environment for a while. I
was wondering with the latest versions, and please
include th
Le 24/05/2013 04:15, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
-Original Message-
From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:27 PM
To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question(s)
[snip]
You could also wait for a
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
> Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013 6:27 PM
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question(s)
>
[snip]
>
> You could also wait for a failover where the VI
Le 22/05/2013 02:13, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
> >Any help or suggestions muchly appreciated
> >
>
>Also, fencing!
Not sure that I need it. The app is always running on both nodes, it's just the
ip address that is shared
A cluster without fencing is not a cluster, by definition. Pr
> -Original Message-
> From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 May 2013 10:18 PM
> To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question(s)
>
> Le 21/05/2013 07:04, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
> &
Le 21/05/2013 07:04, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit :
Hi
I have setup a small 2 node cluster that we are using for HA a java app.
Basically the requirement is to provide HA and later on load balancing.
My initial plan was to use
2 nodes of linux
Iptables cluster module to do the load balanci
Hi
I have setup a small 2 node cluster that we are using for HA a java app.
Basically the requirement is to provide HA and later on load balancing.
My initial plan was to use
2 nodes of linux
Iptables cluster module to do the load balancing
Cluster software to do the failover.
I have left the
18 matches
Mail list logo
