> -----Original Message----- > From: Florian Crouzat [mailto:gen...@floriancrouzat.net] > Sent: Tuesday, 21 May 2013 10:18 PM > To: pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] newbie question(s) > > Le 21/05/2013 07:04, Alex Samad - Yieldbroker a écrit : > > Hi > > > > I have setup a small 2 node cluster that we are using for HA a java app. [snip]
> > is there anything I should be doing differently, I have seen colocation > option and something about affinity of resources, but I used group which > would be the best practise way of doing it ? > > > > Probably writing a better ocf script that doesn't rely on 'ps' (eww!) but on a > real lsb 'status'. So the test is a 2 part one, check the process is running and then make a call against the a status api. There is a timeout period associated with the api call so I check first to see if its running > [snip] > > Maybe the user that runs pacemaker have the right to execute your 'ybrp' > ocf script but not the 'ps' that you used in it ? Don't think so as it runs fine and then occasionally fails > It returns 4 (<> 0), it should be quite easy to read > /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/yb/ybrp and search what would return 4 in the > "status" section. Oh silly me I was using the lib error codes an mistook $OCF_ERR_PERM as permanent not permissions ! But does this mean that pacemaker will not try and move the resource (IP) to the other node. > [snip] > > > > Any help or suggestions muchly appreciated > > > > Also, fencing! Not sure that I need it. The app is always running on both nodes, it's just the ip address that is shared > > > > > Thanks > > Alex > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Florian Crouzat > Thanks _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
