> On 17 Oct 2014, at 9:53 am, Errol Neal wrote:
>
> Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
>>
>> Yes. If you want the cluster to start things in a particular order,
> then you need to specify it.
>
> Andrew, but my issue isn't getting the resources to start in a a
> specific order. My issue is that I ca
Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
> Yes. If you want the cluster to start things in a particular order,
then you need to specify it.
Andrew, but my issue isn't getting the resources to start in a a
specific order. My issue is that I can't get the slave resource to get
promoted when the previous maste
On 14 Oct 2014, at 12:58 am, Errol Neal wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof writes:
>
>>>
>>> Here is my full pacemaker config:
>>>
>>> http://pastebin.com/jw6WTpZz
>>>
>>> My understanding is that in order for N to start, N+1 must already
> be
>>> running. So my configuration (to me) reads that the
Andrew Beekhof writes:
> >
> > Here is my full pacemaker config:
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/jw6WTpZz
> >
> > My understanding is that in order for N to start, N+1 must already
be
> > running. So my configuration (to me) reads that the ms_md0 master
> > resource must be started and running
On 10 Oct 2014, at 12:08 am, Errol Neal wrote:
> Hi all. I was hoping to get some help with my configuration. I'm kinda
> stuck at the moment.
>
> I've made some changes to the Raid1 RA to implement a ms style
> configuration (you can see a diff here http://pastebin.com/Q2nbF6Rg
> against t
Hi all. I was hoping to get some help with my configuration. I'm kinda
stuck at the moment.
I've made some changes to the Raid1 RA to implement a ms style
configuration (you can see a diff here http://pastebin.com/Q2nbF6Rg
against the RA in the github repo)
I've modeled my ms implementation h
