> On 17 Oct 2014, at 9:53 am, Errol Neal <en...@businessgrade.com> wrote: > > Andrew Beekhof <andrew@...> writes: > >> >> Yes. If you want the cluster to start things in a particular order, > then you need to specify it. > > Andrew, but my issue isn't getting the resources to start in a a > specific order. My issue is that I can't get the slave resource to get > promoted when the previous master goes offline.
Ok. I was responding to "My understanding is that in order for N to start, N+1 must already be running." Is your RA using crm_master to indicate a preference for being promoted on both nodes? It could also be that newer versions have gotten smarter about how to handle the situation. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
