On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Rasto Levrinc
> wrote:
>> Hi Beekhof,
>>
>> I've found again a Pacemaker bug or I am doing again something wrong. :)
>>
>> So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but
>> running.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
> Hi Beekhof,
>
> I've found again a Pacemaker bug or I am doing again something wrong. :)
>
> So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but
> running. The group has colocation constraint with score -INFINITY with the
>
On Wed, December 16, 2009 8:26 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2009-12-15T17:37:27, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
>
>
>> So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but
>> running. The group has colocation constraint with score -INFINITY with
>> the third dummy resource. The grou
On 2009-12-15T17:37:27, Rasto Levrinc wrote:
> So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but
> running. The group has colocation constraint with score -INFINITY with the
> third dummy resource. The group resources are running on one node and the
> third dummy resource on
Hi Beekhof,
I've found again a Pacemaker bug or I am doing again something wrong. :)
So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but
running. The group has colocation constraint with score -INFINITY with the
third dummy resource. The group resources are running on one node
