On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Rasto Levrinc <rasto.levr...@linbit.com> wrote: > Hi Beekhof, > > I've found again a Pacemaker bug or I am doing again something wrong. :) > > So I have a group with two dummy resources that are both unmanaged but > running. The group has colocation constraint with score -INFINITY with the > third dummy resource. The group resources are running on one node and the > third dummy resource on the other. > > So far so good. > > Now I set the first resource in the group to be managed by pacemaker and > all managed resources decide to move to the opposite nodes. This I would > not expect. Resource stickiness is set. If I reverse the colocation > constraint (exchange "rsc" and "with-rsc") it works ok.
is-managed doesn't cause the move, it just allows pacemaker to perform it. the real issue is the constraint. Seems like you might have found a bug in the way the scores are merged for groups. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
