Re: [Pacemaker] [ha-wg-technical] [RFC] Organizing HA Summit 2015

__ > ha-wg-technical mailing list > ha-wg-techni...@lists.linux-foundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ha-wg-technical > -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://os

Re: [Pacemaker] PgSQL_Replicated_Cluster wiki's bug

Anzai-san, Thank you very much for pointing it out. Yes, you are right. I have updated the wiki page and should be fixed now. Regards, Keisuke MORI 2014-04-08 11:15 GMT+09:00 Naoya Anzai : > Hi,All > > I'm reading following wiki: > http://clusterlabs.org/mwik

Re: [Pacemaker] pre_notify_demote is issued twice

Hi, 2014-02-24 10:49 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 21 Feb 2014, at 2:19 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> >> On 18 Feb 2014, at 1:23 pm, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >>> >>> On 6 Feb 2014, at 7:45 pm, Keisuke MORI wrote: >>> >>>&g

Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11

Hi Andrew, 2014/1/16 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 16 Jan 2014, at 3:00 pm, Keisuke MORI wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just curious, >> I found that RC4 has been branched out of the master after RC3. >> >> What would the fixes only in the master branch be in th

Re: [Pacemaker] Time to get ready for 1.1.11

t; >> >> > >> -- Vossel >> >> Alright, New RC time. Pacemaker-1.1.11-rc3. >> >> If no regressions are encountered, rc3 will become the 1.1.11 final release a >> week from today. >> >> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/releases/tag/P

Re: [Pacemaker] [Problem][crmsh]The designation of the 'ordered' attribute becomes the error.

red in 1.0.14 maintenance release, which is not scheduled yet though. Thanks, Keisuke MORI > Many Thanks! > Hideo Yamauchi. > --- On Tue, 2013/4/2, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 09:19:51PM +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote: > &g

Re: [Pacemaker] Compilation problem in centos 6.3

acemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org > -- Keisuke MORI ___

[Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell: improve sanity check for start/stop interval parameter

d also the message is a bit confusing. I would suggest the attached patch. -- Keisuke MORI interval.patch Description: Binary data ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project

[Pacemaker] LF#2605 pingd misdetection of failure when kernel.pid_max > 65536

Hi, I've filed one issue to bugzilla. Please find the detail and the patch on it. LF#2605 pingd misdetection of failure when kernel.pid_max > 65536 http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2605 Thanks, -- Keis

[Pacemaker] HealthSMART RA fix devices option

Hi, HealthSMART RA seems not working properly when you specified 'devices' option. Suggest the attached patch. Thanks, -- Keisuke MORI HealthSMART: fix devices option diff -r cf4e9febed8e extra/resources/HealthSMART --- a/extra/resources/HealthSMART Wed Feb 23 14:52:34 2011 +0100 +

Re: [Pacemaker] Pacemaker-1.1.4, when?

up is not the major factor of the performance issue. It's all up to you. Hope it helps. Thanks, Keisuke MORI > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:59 AM, nozawat wrote: >> Hi Andrew and Nikola, >> >>   Oneself carried out regression test, too, and an error was given

[Pacemaker] [FYI] Required errata for RHEL5

50d4b424388a7ea7230d Acknowledgments: Many thanks to Hideo Yamauchi and RedHat support for resolving this issue. I hope it helps to all. Thanks, -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailma

Re: [Pacemaker] Project updates

2010/11/18 Andrew Beekhof : > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Keisuke MORI >> wrote: >>>>>  STABLE_SERIES          = stable-1.0 >>>>> >>>>>  RPM_ROOT       = $(shell pwd) >

Re: [Pacemaker] Project updates

blem because all the logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9". Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix? Regards, -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mail

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_mon and pingd

ailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: >> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker >> > > ______

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_mon and pingd

http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@os

Re: [Pacemaker] resource stop timeout broken in 1.0 branch tip

Hi Andrew, 2010/10/12 Andrew Beekhof : > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Keisuke MORI > wrote: >> 2010/10/9 Andrew Beekhof : >>> ACK, no objection to this being backported :-) >> >> Also done, along with a minor compilation fix. >> http://hg.c

Re: [Pacemaker] resource stop timeout broken in 1.0 branch tip

2010/10/9 Andrew Beekhof : > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Lars Ellenberg > wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:29:12PM +0900, Keisuke MORI wrote: >>> 2010/10/6 Andrew Beekhof : >>> >> Is there more changesets >>> >> that need to be backported

Re: [Pacemaker] About behavior in "Action Lost".

2010/10/7 Andrew Beekhof : > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Keisuke MORI > wrote: >> Andrew, >> >> 2010/9/23 Andrew Beekhof : >>> Pushed as: >>>   http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/1.1/rev/8433015faf18 >>> >>> Not sure about applyi

Re: [Pacemaker] About behavior in "Action Lost".

s not fenced when it ought to be and failed to continue the service. I would also think that it would be good to have the same behavior between 1.0 and 1.1 in such a critical condition to support both versions better. Thanks, Keisuke MORI > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:18 AM,   w

Re: [Pacemaker] resource stop timeout broken in 1.0 branch tip

original patch wouldn't > have worked if the resource definition changed. I see, I will backport this to 1.0 too. Thanks, -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/p

Re: [Pacemaker] Can somebody please explain pengine's urge to move all resources?

to the 1.0 repository and will be included in 1.0.10. Will you test with the tip of 1.0 repository if you have any chance? Thanks, > > MORI-san from NTT is currently working on the backports. > we'll delay .10 until he has a chance to complete the process :-) -- Keisuke MORI ___

Re: [Pacemaker] resource stop timeout broken in 1.0 branch tip

be backported regarding to this issues? If not, I think that the Andreas' patch should be applied to 1.0. It seems to me that the patch is sane as it would restore the old behavior for the stop operation with having the resource attributes as the first patch intended. Thanks,

[Pacemaker] Memory leaks in pacemaker-1.0.8

Hi, Pacemaker-1.0.8 seems to have some memory leakage. Please find the detail on the bugzilla item: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2386 Regards, -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org

[Pacemaker] Pseudo RAs do not work properly on Corosync stack

is encouraged to fix because it may not work well with the maintenance mode, but you can continue to use the old rsctmp if you would like. I would like to hear your thought and comments. Regards, -- Keisuke MORI ___ Pacemaker mailing list