Hi Andrew, >> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's >>> attention to a couple of updates that went out today.
Congratulations for the 1.0.10 release! It is the great excitement for us too, but one thing I would like to comment... 2010/11/13 Andrew Beekhof <and...@beekhof.net>: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchep...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> STABLE_SERIES = stable-1.0 >> >> RPM_ROOT = $(shell pwd) >> diff -r 99f5a1e61667 configure.ac >> --- a/configure.ac Fri Nov 12 09:12:32 2010 +0100 >> +++ b/configure.ac Fri Nov 12 11:47:28 2010 -0500 >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ >> dnl checks for library functions >> dnl checks for system services >> >> -AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.9, pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org) >> +AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.10, pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org) > > thats kinda annoying but not crucial. thanks for pointing it out > This would be confusing for users to tell which version they're actually using when they are going to report a problem because all the logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9". Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix? Regards, -- Keisuke MORI _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
