Re: [Pacemaker] Question about multiple instance_attributes

2015-04-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2015-04-13 19:53 GMT+09:00 Andrei Borzenkov : > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: >> 2015-04-10 15:09 GMT+09:00 Andrei Borzenkov : >>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Kazunori INOUE >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >&g

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about multiple instance_attributes

2015-04-13 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2015-04-10 15:09 GMT+09:00 Andrei Borzenkov : > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I defined multiple instance_attributes [*]. >> * >> http://clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1-pcs/html/Pacemaker_Explained/_using_ru

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd-transition-delay does not work

2014-05-02 Thread Kazunori INOUE
LOG_TRACE) != NULL) { > +xpathObj = xpath_search(msg, "//" XML_CIB_TAG_CRMCONFIG); > +if(numXpathResults(xpathObj) > 0) { > mainloop_set_trigger(config_read); > } > +freeXpathObject(xpathObj); > } > > static void > > > On 25

[Pacemaker] crmd-transition-delay does not work

2014-04-25 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ml.c:5941 ) trace: get_xpath_object: Unexpected Input crmd: ( xml.c:5941 ) trace: get_xpath_object: Unexpected Input crmd: ( xml.c:5941 ) trace: get_xpath_object: Unexpected Input Change of 'cluster_property_set' has not been applie

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

2014-04-23 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-04-23 19:32 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 23 Apr 2014, at 7:17 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> 2014-04-22 0:45 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : >>> >>> - Original Message - >>>> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >>>> To: "pm

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

2014-04-23 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-04-22 0:45 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "pm" >> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 4:49:42 AM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified >> >

[Pacemaker] "reset" action of fence_legacy is not performed

2014-04-23 Thread Kazunori INOUE
log_operation: F1:18288 [ Performing: stonith -t external/libvirt -T off pm104 ] Since glue's plug-in has "reset" action equivalent to "reboot" action, I want to perform "reboot" as before, when stonith-action=reboot. Regards, Kazunori INOUE __

[Pacemaker] crmd does abort if a stopped node is specified

2014-04-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, crmd does abort if I load CIB which specified a stopped node. # crm_mon -1 Last updated: Fri Apr 18 11:51:36 2014 Last change: Fri Apr 18 11:51:30 2014 Stack: corosync Current DC: pm103 (3232261519) - partition WITHOUT quorum Version: 1.1.11-cf82673 1 Nodes configured 0 Resources configured

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11

2014-03-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-03-19 0:55 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" >> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 12:30:01 AM >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemak

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11

2014-03-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-03-18 8:03 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" >> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:51:11 AM >> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11

2014-03-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-03-17 16:37 GMT+09:00 Kazunori INOUE : > 2014-03-15 4:08 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : >> >> >> - Original Message - >>> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >>> To: "pm" >>> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:52:38 AM >>> Subje

Re: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11

2014-03-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-03-15 4:08 GMT+09:00 David Vossel : > > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "pm" >> Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 5:52:38 AM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11 >> >> Hi,

[Pacemaker] crmd was aborted at pacemaker 1.1.11

2014-03-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
;Fri Mar 14 18:32:48 2014', queued=0ms, exec=0ms Just for reference, similar phenomenon did not occur by crm_standby. $ crm_standby -U X3650H -v on Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about log level at monitor

2014-02-28 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-02-24 12:00 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 21 Feb 2014, at 9:35 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> 2014-02-20 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : >>> >>> On 20 Feb 2014, at 8:37 pm, Kazunori INOUE >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >&g

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about log level at monitor

2014-02-21 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-02-20 18:59 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 20 Feb 2014, at 8:37 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Is this by design although log levels differ with a stonith resource >> and other resources in Pacemaker-1.1.11 ? >> >> "P1"

[Pacemaker] Question about log level at monitor

2014-02-20 Thread Kazunori INOUE
LRM operation P1_monitor_3 (call=12, rc=7, cib-update=64, confirmed=false) not running crmd[22860]:error: process_lrm_event: LRM operation F1_monitor_3 (call=13, status=4, cib-update=61, confirmed=false) Error Regards, Kazunori INOUE _

Re: [Pacemaker] stopped resource was judged to be active

2014-02-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014-02-18 10:43 GMT+09:00 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 10 Feb 2014, at 5:28 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Pacemaker stopped, but it was judged that a resource was active. >> I put crm_report here. >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9eNn1AWfKD4S29JWk

[Pacemaker] stopped resource was judged to be active

2014-02-09 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Best regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1

2014-01-10 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014/1/9 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 8 Jan 2014, at 9:15 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> 2014/1/8 Andrew Beekhof : >>> >>> On 18 Dec 2013, at 9:50 pm, Kazunori INOUE >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi David, >>>> >>>> 2

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1

2014-01-08 Thread Kazunori INOUE
2014/1/8 Andrew Beekhof : > > On 18 Dec 2013, at 9:50 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> 2013/12/18 David Vossel : >>> >>> That's a really weird one... I don't see how it is possible for op->id to >>> be NULL there.

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior of the post-failure during the migrate_to

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, 2013/12/19 David Vossel : > > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "pm" >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 4:56:20 AM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior of the post-failure during the >&g

[Pacemaker] Question about node-action-limit and migration-limit

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
n", &check_timer, "*** Advanced Use Only ***.", "If need to adjust this value, it probably indicates the presence of a bug." }, { XML_CONFIG_ATTR_FORCE_QUIT, "shutdown_escalation", "time", NULL, "20min", &check_timer, "*** Advanced

Re: [Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1

2013-12-18 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, 2013/12/18 David Vossel : > > That's a really weird one... I don't see how it is possible for op->id to be > NULL there. You might need to give valgrind a shot to detect whatever is > really going on here. > > -- Vossel > Thank you for

[Pacemaker] lrmd segfault at pacemaker 1.1.11-rc1

2013-12-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
main.c:314 Although I'm investigating the cause, I have not discovered yet... Because size was big, I put crm_report here. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9eNn1AWfKD4WGY5bllMQW1BbDA/edit?usp=sharing Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemak

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the resource to fence a node

2013-11-13 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, Andrew 2013/11/13 Kazunori INOUE : > 2013/11/13 Andrew Beekhof : >> >> On 16 Oct 2013, at 8:51 am, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >>> >>> On 15/10/2013, at 8:24 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic

2013-11-06 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, 2013/11/6 David Vossel : > - Original Message - >> From: "Kazunori INOUE" >> To: "pm" >> Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 4:43:53 AM >> Subject: [Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic >> >> Hi David, >&

[Pacemaker] Question about new migration logic

2013-11-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, Because I have a plan to test the function of migration in pacemaker-1.1, I am interested in this commit. https://github.com/davidvossel/pacemaker/commit/673e8599e4 If this "new migration logic" is merged into ClusterLabs, when do you think it will be merged? Best Regards

Re: [Pacemaker] An internal error occurred in crmd

2013-10-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
by: >https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/d65b270 > > What are you doing to this poor cluster? :) I intend to test a function of migration of pacemaker-1.1. Kazunori INOUE > > On 21 Oct 2013, at 3:59 pm, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a resource was put into unmanaged mode

2013-08-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, I confirmed that this problem was fixed. Thanks. (13.08.01 15:26), Andrew Beekhof wrote: Fixed: https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/0c996a1 On 01/08/2013, at 2:00 AM, David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacem

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a resource was put into unmanaged mode

2013-07-31 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I opened Bugzilla about this. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5173 Best Regards. (13.08.01 01:00), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 1:20:58 AM Subject:

[Pacemaker] Question about behavior when a resource was put into unmanaged mode

2013-07-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. (4ae1f17) When I put a primitive (p1) of group resource into unmanaged mode, low-order primitive (p2) restarted. In the case of pacemaker-1.0.13, p2 doesn't stop (it continues "Started"). Is this the assumed behavior? node $id="3232261523" dev2 node $id="323226152

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-25 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.25 18:03), Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.25 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-25 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.25 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 24/07/2013, at 7:40 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-24 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.18 19:23), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 17/07/2013, at 6:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.16 21:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 16/07/2013, at 7:04 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-16 Thread Kazunori INOUE
onith1-2 \ <- libvirt prmStonith1-3 <- meatware "group" is a trace when I left only libvirt to simplify an event. Thanks Thanks 2013/7/12 Kazunori INOUE Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the behavior when a pacemaker's process crashed

2013-07-16 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10. When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not sometimes fenced. Is this the assumed behavior? Yes. Sometimes the dev1 re

[Pacemaker] start of pacemaker fails

2013-06-10 Thread Kazunori INOUE
case pcmk_cluster_corosync: name = corosync_node_name(0, nodeid); +do_uname = TRUE; break; # endif #endif $ Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://o

Re: [Pacemaker] S_POLICY_ENGINE state continues being maintained

2013-05-24 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.05.24 13:38), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 24/05/2013, at 2:19 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On 23/05/2013, at 4:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c3486a4a8d. the latest devel). After fencing caused by split-brain failed 11 times, S_POLICY_ENGINE state is kept

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the error when fencing failed

2013-04-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ct: Re: [Pacemaker] Question about the error when fencing failed > > This should solve your issue: > > https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/dbbb6a6 > > On 11/04/2013, at 7:23 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > (13.04.08 11:04),

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about recovery policy after "Too many failures to fence"

2013-04-17 Thread Kazunori INOUE
uot;Too many > failures to fence" > > > On 11/04/2013, at 7:23 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > (13.04.08 12:01), Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> > >> On 27/03/2013, at 7:45 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: > >> >

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2013-04-11 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, (13.03.01 11:10), Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Yes, please see attached pacemaker.conf. It controls only pacemakerd. > > I've pushed up the basic one in > https://githu

[Pacemaker] Question about the error when fencing failed

2013-04-04 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ng_topology \ dev1: f-dev1 \ dev2: f-dev2 property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.10-1.el6-132019b" \ cluster-infrastructure="corosync" \ no-quorum-policy="ignore" \ stonith-timeout="70s" Be

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about crm_mon -n option

2013-04-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.03.27 18:01), Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using pacemaker-1.1 (c7910371a5. the latest devel). >> >> In the case of globally-unique="false", instance numbers are appended &g

[Pacemaker] Question about recovery policy after "Too many failures to fence"

2013-03-27 Thread Kazunori INOUE
nith1(stonith:external/stonith-helper): Started dev2 Resource Group: grpStonith2 prmStonith2(stonith:external/stonith-helper): Started dev1 Failed actions: prmDummy_monitor_1 (node=dev2, call=23, rc=7, status=complete): not running Best Regards, Kazunori

[Pacemaker] Question about crm_mon -n option

2013-03-27 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ne prmDummy:0 (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started Case without -n, instance numbers are not appended. $ crm_mon -r : Full list of resources: Clone Set: clnDummy [prmDummy] Started: [ dev1 dev2 ] Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE _

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2013-03-04 Thread Kazunori INOUE
akerd dies > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > Yes, please see attached pacemaker.conf. It controls only pacemakerd. > > I've pushed up the basic one in > https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/4bd8

Re: [Pacemaker] Please add pcmk__timeout parameter to stonithd metadata

2013-02-13 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I confirmed it. Thanks. Kazunori INOUE > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Beekhof [mailto:and...@beekhof.net] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:58 PM > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Please add pcmk__timeout paramete

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2013-02-13 Thread Kazunori INOUE
orosync is terminated immediately. By doing so, the machine reboots by watchdog of corosync. (since we want to poweroff/reset the machine *certainly* in this case.) Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (13.02.08 10:03), Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:09 PM, Kazunori INOUE > wrot

[Pacemaker] Please add pcmk__timeout parameter to stonithd metadata

2013-02-08 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ant to commit? - The circumstances which added these parameters. http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5093 https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/ca7acf6#diff-1 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.c

[Pacemaker] About environment variable of Pacemaker processes

2013-02-04 Thread Kazunori INOUE
cemaker.c @@ -804,6 +804,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) qb_ipcs_service_t *ipcs = NULL; const char *facility = daemon_option("logfacility"); +setenv("LC_ALL", "C", 1); set_daemon_option("mcp", "true"); set_daemon_option("use_l

[Pacemaker] bump some log messages to notice

2013-02-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I added the detailed reason for the request to the closed request. So will you reconsider it? https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/pull/205#issuecomment-12489516 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker

[Pacemaker] Question about log-facility of STONITH plugin

2013-02-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ha-log $ The log of RA belonged to local1 which I appointed in PCMK_logfacility, but plugin belonged to daemon. * Since environment variable HA_LOGFACILITY was not set, ha_log.sh used daemon. http://hg.linux-ha.org/glue/file/da5832ae23dd/lib/stonith/ha_log.s

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2013-01-22 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(13.01.10 13:35), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi Andrew, I have another question about this subject. Even if pengine, stonithd, and attrd crash after pacemakerd is killed (for example, killed by OOM_Killer), node status does not change

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2013-01-09 Thread Kazunori INOUE
e: [ dev1 dev2 ] prmDummy (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started dev1 Node (dev1) remains Online. When other processes such as lrmd crash, it becomes "UNCLEAN (offline)". Is this a bug? Or specifications? Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (13.01.08 09:16), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, De

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-12-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(12.12.13 08:26), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I recognize that pacemakerd is much less likely to crash. However, a possibility of being killed by OOM_Killer etc. is not 0%. True. Although we just established in another thread that we

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-12-12 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(12.12.06 12:18), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (12.12.05 02:02), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 11:

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-12-05 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(12.12.05 02:02), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" Sent: Monday, December 3, 2012 11:41:56 PM Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies (12.12.03 20

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-12-03 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(12.12.03 20:24), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: (12.11.30 23:52), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:38:50 AM Subject: [Pacemaker]

Re: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-12-03 Thread Kazunori INOUE
(12.11.30 23:52), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 2:38:50 AM Subject: [Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies Hi, I am testing the latest version. - C

[Pacemaker] node status does not change even if pacemakerd dies

2012-11-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
e function of this deleted code. https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/dfdfb6c9087e644cb898143e198b240eb9a928b4 related bugzilla: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list:

Re: [Pacemaker] crm_mon -W crash

2012-11-28 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I confirmed that this problem was solved with your patch. Thanks. (12.11.29 01:06), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:54:56 AM

[Pacemaker] crm_mon -W crash

2012-11-28 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, I try to handle SNMP trap with crm_mon. However, crm_mon crashes with SIGSEGV at the time of fencing. [environment] - Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.3 (Santiago) - ClusterLabs/pacemaker 9c13d14640(Nov 27, 2012) - corosync 92e0f9c7bb(Nov 07, 2012) [root@dev1

Re: [Pacemaker] master-slave resource repeats restart

2012-10-16 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I opened Bugzilla about this. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5111 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.10.15 23:46), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp Sent

Re: [Pacemaker] master/slave resource does not stop (tries start repeatedly)

2012-09-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I confirmed that both problems were fixed. Thanks. (12.09.20 07:58), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi Andrew, I confirmed that this problem had been resolved. - ClusterLabs/pacemaker : 7a9bf21cfc However, I found two problems. Ah

Re: [Pacemaker] stop's on-fail of a master-slave resource is not effective

2012-09-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I confirmed that this bug was fixed. Thank you so much. (12.09.20 08:32), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, In pacemaker-1.1, - CLusterLabs/pacemaker : b7db8b292d (Sep 18) on-fail of stop of a master-slave resource is not effective

Re: [Pacemaker] master/slave resource does not stop (tries start repeatedly)

2012-09-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
, resource-id which attached instance number (:0) is used as a key as needed. - resource-id which removed instance number is used for the update request to CIB. Are the specifications (approach) of this patch right? Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.09.11 20:17), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On T

Re: [Pacemaker] monitor of stonith resource times out

2012-08-15 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, I reported it in Bugzilla. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5098 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.15 19:08), Andrew Beekhof wrote: Ouch. Yes definitely a bug. I seem to recall David looking into something like this recently... did you file a bug that he has been working

Re: [Pacemaker] STONITH is not performed after stonithd reboots

2012-08-08 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Thanks Andrew, I opened Bugzilla about this. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5094 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.07 20:30), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, This problem has not been fixed yet. (2012 Jul 29, 33119da31c) When

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about stonith-timeout

2012-08-06 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, Thanks for reply. I opened Bugzilla about this. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5093 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.06 13:57), Andrew Beekhof wrote: I wondered when this request would come. David was just looking at action timeouts, perhaps he has some ideas on how to

Re: [Pacemaker] Timeout value of STONITH resource is too large

2012-08-05 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I reported it in Bugzilla with config. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5092 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.03 12:19), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager" Sent

Re: [Pacemaker] Among monitor of STONITH resource, monitor of other resources is not performed

2012-08-02 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I reported it in Bugzilla with crm_report. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.01 06:49), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "David Vossel" To: "The Pacemaker cluster r

Re: [Pacemaker] Timeout value of STONITH resource is too large

2012-08-02 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ack->timeout+5), st_child_kill, track); Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.08.01 00:01), David Vossel wrote: ----- Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Cc: shimaza...@intellilink.co.jp Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 5:13:40 AM Subject: [Pacemak

Re: [Pacemaker] STONITH is not performed after stonithd reboots

2012-08-01 Thread Kazunori INOUE
s_set(fsa_input_register, R_ST_REQUIRED)) { crm_crit("Fencing daemon connection failed"); +register_fsa_input(C_FSA_INTERNAL, I_ERROR, NULL); mainloop_set_trigger(stonith_reconnect); } else { [root@dev1 pacemaker]# Best regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.09

[Pacemaker] Among monitor of STONITH resource, monitor of other resources is not performed

2012-07-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
00 S 0.0 0.0 0:06.93 migration/0 4 root 20 0 000 S 0.0 0.0

[Pacemaker] Question about stonith-timeout

2012-07-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
imeout cannot be set to each STONITH in Pacemaker-1.1? Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE ___ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started:

[Pacemaker] Timeout value of STONITH resource is too large

2012-07-30 Thread Kazunori INOUE
4 root 20 0 0

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about behavior when pacemakerd was terminated

2012-05-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, I reported it in Bugzilla. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5064 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.09 16:12), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, I am using Pacemaker-1.1 (devel: db5e167). When

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about crmsh

2012-05-14 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, Thanks for your reply. I opened an enhancement request. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5065 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.11 23:20), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 08:31:51PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about config

2012-05-11 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Thanks Andrew, I see how it is. Kazunori INOUE (12.05.09 16:16), Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, On the Pacemkaer-1.1 + Corosync stack, is it specification not to read 'service' directive (use_logd option)? * https://

Re: [Pacemaker] Question about crmsh

2012-05-11 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, Thanks for the reply. I'll open an enhancement request. Should I open a request here? * https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?group=crmsh Or here? * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Pacemaker - under the Shell component. Best regards, Kazunori

Re: [Pacemaker] monitor operation is not resumed

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi David, I reported it in Bugzilla. Please confirm it. * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5063 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (12.05.07 23:45), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Sent: Monday, May 7, 201

[Pacemaker] monitor operation is not resumed

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
il="restart" \ * 2. Then, monitor is NOT resumed although changed into enabled="true". # crm configure edit # crm configure show | grep monitor op monitor interval="10s" enabled="true" timeout="60s" on-fail="restart" \ Best regar

[Pacemaker] STONITH is not performed after stonithd reboots

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
[15115]:debug: stonith_query: Found 0 matching devices for 'vm2' May 2 16:13:19 vm1 stonith-ng[15115]:debug: stonith_query: Found 0 matching devices for 'vm2' May 2 16:13:31 vm1 stonith-ng[15115]:debug: stonith_query: Found 0 matching devices for 'vm2&#x

[Pacemaker] Question about crmsh

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hello, We are checking the feature of Pacemaker-1.1. Since fencing topology(*) is a new feature, we pay attention and use it. * https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/blob/master/xml/fencing.rng So when is 'fencing topology' implemented in crmsh? Best regards, Kazu

[Pacemaker] Question about config

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ck=full --trace-children=no --num-callers=25 --log-file=/tmp/pacemaker-%p.valgrind" export HA_LOGD=no Since the default value of HA_LOGD may be "yes", we want to set "no". * http://hg.linux-ha.org/glue/file/66d5f0c135c9/lib/stonith/ha_log.s

[Pacemaker] Question about behavior when pacemakerd was terminated

2012-05-07 Thread Kazunori INOUE
ition WITHOUT quorum Online: [ vm1 vm2 ] prmDummy (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started vm2 # ssh vm2 'pkill -9 pacemakerd' # crm_mon -r Current DC: vm1 (1) - partition WITHOUT quorum Node vm2 (2): UNCLEAN (offline) Online: [ vm1 ] Full list of resource

Re: [Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective

2012-04-09 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi, (12.04.07 06:19), David Vossel wrote: - Original Message - From: "Kazunori INOUE" To: "pacemaker@oss" Cc: koi...@intellilink.co.jp Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2012 10:08:44 PM Subject: [Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective Hi, I am using

[Pacemaker] on-fail is not effective

2012-04-05 Thread Kazunori INOUE
# Attached gdb_pengine.log is a log of gdb at the time of monitor failure. Is it because the 2nd argument (variable 'key') of the find_rsc_op_entry() function is "prmDummy1_last_failure_0"? Thereby, it seems that "on-fail" cannot be identified. (L117~L205) Best Regards, Kazun

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2012-01-19 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, I tested this patch and got the result we wanted. Thank you so much! Kazunori INOUE (12.01.19 08:23), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, Can you please test the attached patch. I'm not sure if it covers all cases, but I believe that it is the right direction. I test

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-12-09 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, I had a discussion with Andrew about it. Can you please check this? * http://bugs.clusterlabs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5006 Regards, Kazunori INOUE (11.09.22 19:19), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 05:50:53PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi Dejan

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-09-22 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, (2011/06/21 21:59), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, Apologies for not getting back to you sooner. On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 06:17:31PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi, (2011/05/27 19:32), Lars Ellenberg wrote: Oh no. Now you have duplicated all nodes, and will always get

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-06-24 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, (2011/06/22 16:02), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi Kazunori-san, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:14:04PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi Dejan, Thank you for the response. All right. We'll wait. The issue is somewhat more serious, probably. All elements from the CIB are referenced b

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-06-21 Thread Kazunori INOUE
return self.add_op(cli_list) if obj_type == "node": +replace_node_id(cli_list) +obj_id = find_value(head[1],"id") obj = self.find_object(obj_id) # make an exception and allow updating nodes if obj: # Best

Re: [Pacemaker] crm shell - 'location' configuration with multiple id-ref

2011-06-13 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Dejan, I reported it in Bugzilla. Please confirm it. http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2602 Best Regards, Kazunori INOUE (2011/06/10 17:57), Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 04:22:00PM +0900, Kazunori INOUE wrote: Hi all, I loaded 'loc

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-06-06 Thread Kazunori INOUE
rv-a1'], ['id', '0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57192caeb']]], ['utilization', [['capacity', '1']]]] (snip) In other words attached patch will get the same result as loading following cli. # cat test2.cli node $id="0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-05-27 Thread Kazunori INOUE
utilization capacity="1" node $id="68057c1e-6a5e-402b-be84-c56b98d5c985" srv-a2 node $id="0cd9d2df-13fa-4b11-93d3-27a57192caeb" srv-a1 property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \ dc-version="1.1.5-1.25.el6-5bdfc629f35af0305bb87676297d81251f0511ea&q

[Pacemaker] [PATCH] crm shell (configure node) for Heartbeat stack

2011-05-11 Thread Kazunori INOUE
=== -> Node srv-a1: UNCLEAN (offline) Online: [ srv-a2 srv-a1 ] Node Attributes: * Node srv-a2: -> * Node srv-a1: # Regards, Kazunori INOUE diff -urN pacemaker-1.1.ORG/shell/modules/cibconfig.py pacemaker-1.1.MOD/shell/modules/cibconfig.py --- pacemaker-1.1.ORG/shell/modules/cibconfig

Re: [Pacemaker] [PATCH] pingd: set ICMP6 filter

2009-10-15 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi Andrew, Andrew Beekhof wrote: 2009/10/9 Kazunori INOUE : Hi all, I'm posting patch for pignd in Pacemaker 1.0 (changeset:6cf252e61e25). This patch sets the filter of ICMP6 and fixed some bugs. Could you be a little more specific about what those bugs were? :-) I'm sorry, I

[Pacemaker] [PATCH] pingd: set ICMP6 filter

2009-10-09 Thread Kazunori INOUE
Hi all, I'm posting patch for pignd in Pacemaker 1.0 (changeset:6cf252e61e25). This patch sets the filter of ICMP6 and fixed some bugs. I hope they are helpful to you. Regards, Kazunori INOUE diff -urN stable-1.0.org/tools/pingd.c stable-1.0.mod/tools/pingd.c --- stable-1.0.org/tools/pi

  1   2   >