(13.07.15 11:00), Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 12/07/2013, at 6:28 PM, Kazunori INOUE <inouek...@intellilink.co.jp> wrote:
Hi,
I'm using pacemaker-1.1.10.
When a pacemaker's process crashed, the node is sometimes fenced or is not
sometimes fenced.
Is this the assumed behavior?
Yes.
Sometimes the dev1 respawns the processes fast enough that dev2 gets the "hey, i'm
back" notification before the PE gets run and fencing can be initiated.
In such cases, there is nothing to be gained from fencing - dev1 is reachable
and responding.
OK... but I want pacemaker to certainly perform either behavior (fence is
performed or fence is not performed), since operation is troublesome.
I think that it is better if user can specify behavior as an option.
Best regards.
It makes writing CTS tests hard, but it is not incorrect.
procedure:
$ systemctl start pacemaker
$ crm configure load update test.cli
$ pkill -9 lrmd
attachment:
STONITH.tar.bz2 : it's crm_report when fenced
notSTONITH.tar.bz2 : it's crm_report when not fenced
Best regards.
<notSTONITH.tar.bz2><STONITH.tar.bz2>_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
