Le 10 avr. 2014 15:44, "Christian Ciach" a écrit :
>
> I don't really like the idea to periodically poll "crm_node -q" for the
current quorum state. No matter how frequently the monitor-function gets
called, there will always be a small time frame where both nodes will be in
the master state at th
On 11 Apr 2014, at 12:29 am, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:04 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>
>> Brian: the detective work above is highly appreciated
>
> NP. I feel like I am getting better at reading these logs and can
> provide some more detailed dissection of them.
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:04 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> Brian: the detective work above is highly appreciated
NP. I feel like I am getting better at reading these logs and can
provide some more detailed dissection of them. And am happy to do so to
help get to the bottom of things. :-)
>
I don't really like the idea to periodically poll "crm_node -q" for the
current quorum state. No matter how frequently the monitor-function gets
called, there will always be a small time frame where both nodes will be in
the master state at the same time.
Is there a way to get a notification to th
