On 11 Apr 2014, at 12:29 am, Brian J. Murrell <br...@interlinx.bc.ca> wrote:

> On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 10:04 +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote: 
>> 
>> Brian: the detective work above is highly appreciated
> 
> NP.  I feel like I am getting better at reading these logs and can
> provide some more detailed dissection of them.  And am happy to do so to
> help get to the bottom of things.  :-)
> 
>> Essentially the node is returning "too fast" (specifically, before the 
>> fencing notification arrives) causing pacemaker to forget the node is up and 
>> healthy.
>> 
>> The fix for this is https://github.com/beekhof/pacemaker/commit/e777b17 and 
>> is present in 1.1.11
> 
> Is there any chance of getting that applied to RHEL 6.5, "quickly"?

Actually I'm no longer sure its in .11, I think git is lying to me.
Best way to get it into RHEL 6 is to have customers report it so I'm allowed to 
fix it there too :)

> 
> Much thanks for your looking into this one Andrew.
> 
> b.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker

Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

Reply via email to