Re: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker stack (dlm_controld.pcmk)

2012-11-04 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
05.11.2012 08:40, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov > wrote: >> 02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>> wrote: 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: ... >> >> One remark about

Re: [Pacemaker] RFC: Any interesting in 2.0.0 betas?

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 01.11.2012 03:28, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 30.10.2012 04:27, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On reflection, I think making this configurable is going to cause more trouble

Re: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker stack(dlm_controld.pcmk)

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Matthew O'Connor wrote: > > On 10/29/2012 08:14 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Option 3 is where things are headed, however the only distro that ships it >> today is Fedora-17 (and shortly 18). >> In this scenario, all components obtain membership and quorum directly

Re: [Pacemaker] Build dlm_controld for pacemaker stack (dlm_controld.pcmk)

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 02.11.2012 02:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov >> wrote: >>> 01.11.2012 02:47, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> ... > > One remark about that - it requires that gfs2 communicates with dlm

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker service start failed.

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Yuusuke Iida wrote: > Hi, Andrew > > > (2012/10/30 13:51), Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Yuusuke Iida >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Andrew >>> >>> >>> (2012/10/26 9:31), Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > > When I described the IP which I

Re: [Pacemaker] MySQL/PostgreSQL HA cluster with Pacemaker

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Andrew wrote: > On 02/11/12 01:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Andrew wrote: >>> >>> On 01/11/12 03:02, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Andrew wrote: > > Hi all. > I try to build 1+1 MySQ

Re: [Pacemaker] node can't join cluster after reboot

2012-11-04 Thread Vladimir Elisseev
Pat, Just in case, I've created a bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441730 Regards, Vlad. On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 08:45 -0800, Patrick Irvine wrote: > Hey Guys, > > Just for the record, I just noticed this thread and it sounded familiar. >I checked my gentoo systems and I had to m

Re: [Pacemaker] node can't join cluster after reboot

2012-11-04 Thread Patrick Irvine
Hey Guys, Just for the record, I just noticed this thread and it sounded familiar. I checked my gentoo systems and I had to mask glib-2.32.4-r1 and use glib-2.30.3 in order to get corosync/pacemaker to work. I had the same problem. Nodes couldn't talk to each other. Sorry I didn't notice

Re: [Pacemaker] node can't join cluster after reboot

2012-11-04 Thread Vladimir Elisseev
Thanks for the explanation. I saw coredumps in the directories you mentioned already. The "suspicious -r1" includes two patches over vanilla version of glib: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679306 http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/glib/files/glib-2.32.4-CVE

Re: [Pacemaker] node can't join cluster after reboot

2012-11-04 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
03.11.2012 18:22, Vladimir Elisseev wrote: > Vladislav, > > Thanks for the hint! Upgrading glig from 2.30.3 to 2.32.4 triggers this > behavior of corosync. Do you know where I can find more info regarding > this problem? That is not corosync but pacemaker, which heavily uses glib internally. And