2012/3/14 Yuusuke Iida :
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I was going to confirm the suicide function by STONITH implemented by
> the following changes.
> https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/1a26605e1b5840f49d44b47a1f083c2cdb6f673b
>
> The environment is as follows.
> Pacemaker-1.1.6(commit 31f6ca36cca
2012/3/6 José Alonso :
> Hi all,
>
> I have 2 Debian nodes with heartbeat and pacemaker 1.1.6 installed, and
> almost everything is working fine, I have only apache configured for
> testing, when a node goes down the failover is done correctly, but there's a
> problem when a node failbacks.
>
> For
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
wrote:
> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when
>>> transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middl
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-03-14T23:49:26, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>
>> > Is the current behavior intended?
>> You mean that a migration is rolled-back due to a transition abort --
>> depending on its progress? I think that is the defined (and intended)
>> be
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi,
I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when
tr
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2012-03-15T15:39:23, "Janec, Jozef" wrote:
>
>> We have configured pacemaker on HAE from novell:
>>
>> cat /etc/sysconfig/sbd
>> SBD_DEVICE="/dev/mapper/SHARED1_part1;/dev/mapper/SHARED2_part1"
>> SBD_OPTS="-W"
>>
>> I'm running 2
On 2012-03-15T14:39:52, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> I think your problem is, that a "crm resource stop" is asynchronous ...
crm has a synchronous mode nowadays too.
He should use that, and first "stop" the resource he wants to stop
before starting to delete bits from the CIB, I think.
Regards,
On 2012-03-15T15:39:23, "Janec, Jozef" wrote:
> We have configured pacemaker on HAE from novell:
>
> cat /etc/sysconfig/sbd
> SBD_DEVICE="/dev/mapper/SHARED1_part1;/dev/mapper/SHARED2_part1"
> SBD_OPTS="-W"
>
> I'm running 2 instances of watcher
>
> root 9157 1 0 11:00 pts/000:
Hi,
On 15.03.2012 14:39, Andreas Kurz wrote:
On 03/15/2012 02:23 PM, Tim Ward wrote:
From: Jake Smith [mailto:jsm...@argotec.com]
Maybe totally in the wrong direction for what you want but...
Put commands in a script and add a until loop with a pgrep
test and sleep 1 till the specific resource
Hello All,
We have configured pacemaker on HAE from novell:
cat /etc/sysconfig/sbd
SBD_DEVICE="/dev/mapper/SHARED1_part1;/dev/mapper/SHARED2_part1"
SBD_OPTS="-W"
I'm running 2 instances of watcher
root 9157 1 0 11:00 pts/000:00:00 sbd: inquisitor
root 9158 9157 0 11:00 pt
That is the weird part I do not understand.
Netstat shows the ports and process name, SELinux is disabled, local firewall
is disabled, no other log entries other than those posted in initial mail.
Which is why I do not understand why it's not working.
UDP traffic only appears with multicast enab
> From: Andreas Kurz [mailto:andr...@hastexo.com]
> >>
> >> Maybe totally in the wrong direction for what you want but...
> >> Put commands in a script and add a until loop with a pgrep
> test and
> >> sleep 1 till the specific resource is stopped then continue?
> >
> > Yes, probably is in the
On 03/15/2012 02:23 PM, Tim Ward wrote:
>> From: Jake Smith [mailto:jsm...@argotec.com]
>>
>> Maybe totally in the wrong direction for what you want but...
>> Put commands in a script and add a until loop with a pgrep
>> test and sleep 1 till the specific resource is stopped then continue?
>
> Y
On 03/15/2012 01:57 PM, Regendoerp, Achim wrote:
> As a status update, not got any further...
> Confirmed with the Networks people that Multicast is enabled, but no luck.
> Using unicast crm is not able to connect to the cluster (below is the unicast
> config used).
> With unicast, there's no traf
> From: Jake Smith [mailto:jsm...@argotec.com]
>
> Maybe totally in the wrong direction for what you want but...
> Put commands in a script and add a until loop with a pgrep
> test and sleep 1 till the specific resource is stopped then continue?
Yes, probably is in the wrong direction. I'm driv
- Original Message -
> From: "Tim Ward"
> To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource manager"
> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:58:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] How to stop a resource?
>
> I think that describes an interactive session?
>
> I know I can do it interactively - just go and ha
I think that describes an interactive session?
I know I can do it interactively - just go and have a cup of coffee after the
"stop" and before the "delete" and manually poll crm status - but what I need
is a programmatic way of doing it.
Plus
/etc/init.d.myResource
isn't going to do anything
As a status update, not got any further...
Confirmed with the Networks people that Multicast is enabled, but no luck.
Using unicast crm is not able to connect to the cluster (below is the unicast
config used).
With unicast, there's no traffic at all (observed via tcpdump)
Beginning to wonder if t
Le 15/03/2012 12:50, Tim Ward a écrit :
So, does anyone have any ideas as to what is going on here, and/or how to
actually stop and then delete something? - thanks!
$ crm configure
property maintenance-mode=true
commit
quit
$ /etc/init.d/myResource stop
$ crm resource
cleanup myResource # so
Hello,
I'm a new Pacemaker user and i trying to understand exactly what it can do
/ can't do in case of MySQL Replication or DRBD replication.
I have two MySQl servers, for the moment with a simple Master/Slave
replication, my need is to implement a high availability system with
automated IP and
The description of resource agents at
http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/Resource_Agents
includes "They are synchronous in nature. That is, you start them, and they
complete some time later, and you are expected to wait for them to complete."
I am assured by team members that we have verified that ou
Hi,
According to the network guy the multicast is all there, but we've got no step
further, so we're trying your suggested method now :)
Didn't know that corosync now supports unicast too, must've missed that...
Thanks for the heads up!
Achim
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Kurz [m
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Phillip Frost
wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
>
>>> However, sometimes pacemakerd will not stop cleanly.
>>
>> OK. Whether this is related to your original problem or not a complete
>> open question, jftr.
>>
>>> I thought it might happen
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:35:01PM +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 March 2012 17:52:21 Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 02:48:11PM +0100, Benjamin Kiessling wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2012.03.14 14:24:10 +0100, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> > > > > dnsCache
15.03.2012 10:55, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
Hi,
I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when
transition is abor
On 03/15/2012 05:22 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 15.03.2012 01:49, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>> On 03/14/2012 08:40 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm observing a little bit unintuitive behavior of migration logic when
>>> transition is aborted (due to CIB change) in the middle of the r
26 matches
Mail list logo
