On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree <l...@suse.com> wrote: > On 2012-03-15T15:39:23, "Janec, Jozef" <jozef.ja...@hp.com> wrote: > >> We have configured pacemaker on HAE from novell: >> >> cat /etc/sysconfig/sbd >> SBD_DEVICE="/dev/mapper/SHARED1_part1;/dev/mapper/SHARED2_part1" >> SBD_OPTS="-W" >> >> I'm running 2 instances of watcher >> >> root 9157 1 0 11:00 pts/0 00:00:00 sbd: inquisitor >> root 9158 9157 0 11:00 pts/0 00:00:00 sbd: watcher: >> /dev/mapper/SHARED1_part1 - slot: 0 >> root 9159 9157 0 11:00 pts/0 00:00:00 sbd: watcher: >> /dev/mapper/SHARED2_part1 - slot: 1 > > That looks fine, but did you read > http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing about the limitations of using > 2 devices? > >> I have running one resource per node >> >> Online: [ b300ple0 b400ple0 ] >> >> sbd_fense_b400 (stonith:external/sbd): Started b400ple0 >> sbd_fense_b300 (stonith:external/sbd): Started b300ple0 > > Why that? Did you read http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing? > > You only have to have one external/sbd per cluster. A single primitive > is sufficient. No need to run several, nor to clone them. > >> Mar 17 11:03:51 b400ple0 stonith-ng: [9467]: info: stonith_device_register: >> Added 'sbd_fense_b400' to the device list (1 active devices) > > Yes, because from the point of view of the stonith-ng, there is only one > "sbd" device, though that internally uses two storage devices - which > stonith-ng doesn't know about. > >> I got: >> >> 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 stonith-ng: [8546]: debug: exec_child_done: Got 60 more >> bytes: Performing: stonith -t external/sbd -S failed: 0.05859375 >> Mar 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 stonith-ng: [8546]: notice: log_operation: >> Operation 'monitor' [15803] for device 'sbd_fense_b300' returned: 1 >> Mar 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 stonith-ng: [8546]: debug: log_operation: >> sbd_fense_b300 output: Performing: stonith -t external/sbd -S >> Mar 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 stonith-ng: [8546]: debug: log_operation: >> sbd_fense_b300 output: failed: 0.05859375 >> Mar 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 lrm-stonith: [15802]: debug: execra: >> sbd_fense_b300_monitor returned 1 >> Mar 15 11:15:33 b300ple0 stonith-ng: [8546]: debug: log_operation: >> sbd_fense_b300 output: (total 60 bytes) > > The agent itself should also have logged something. > > Have you, by chance, configured one external/sbd instance per device? > That would be wrong; you need to run one external/sbd instance per > cluster for all devices. > > Did you read http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing?
Are you suggesting he read http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing? You shouldn't be so subtle, best http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing to http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing be http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing explicit http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/SBD_Fencing. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
