Hi all,
I removed apache from the init-process but still having the same behavior.
When a node rejoins the cluster, all resources are restarted again. Is
there any way to avoid that??
Best regards,
Jose
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Arnold Krille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 05 March 2012 12:
Hi
I want Pacemaker to transit from Master to Stopped directly on demote
without failcount
for managing PostgreSQL streaming replication.
Can Pacemaker do this ?
I returned "$OCF_NOT_RUNNING" on demote as a trial,
but it incremented a failcount.
Regards,
Takatoshi MATSUO
___
Hi,
On Monday 05 March 2012 12:58:16 José Alonso wrote:
> I have 2 Debian nodes with heartbeat and pacemaker 1.1.6 installed, and
> almost everything is working fine, I have only apache configured for
> testing, when a node goes down the failover is done correctly, but there's
> a problem when a n
Hi all,
I have 2 Debian nodes with heartbeat and pacemaker 1.1.6 installed, and
almost everything is working fine, I have only apache configured for
testing, when a node goes down the failover is done correctly, but there's
a problem when a node failbacks.
For example, let's say that Node1 has th
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:58:06AM +0100, Pascal Bleser wrote:
> Does anyone have experience with using an Avocent (formerly known as
> Cyclades) APDU with STONITH ?
> http://www.avocent.de/Products/Category/Power_Distribution_Units/PM1000_2000_3000_PDUs.aspx#tab=details_tab_6
>
> I would be
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> 2012/3/2 Kadlecsik József :
> > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> >
> >> 2012/3/2 Kadlecsik József :
> >> >
> >> > After upgrading to pacemaker 1.1.6, cluster-glue 1.0.8 on Debian, our
> >> > working apcmastersnmp resources stopped to work:
> >
>> Actually, it's desirable to "prevent Pacemaker shutdown" if there are
>> unmanaged resource,
>
> What about unmanaged /and/ failed?
To be more specific, if there remains the resource which failed to
stop operation and went to the unmanaged status with its
on-fail="block" configuration,
it would
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On the one hand the admin is saying "always stop A before B", but then
>> also asking for "stop B" while preventing "stop A".
>> So the admin is making incompatible demands, which one do you want us to
>> ignore?
>
> It seems that the
Hi,
> On the one hand the admin is saying "always stop A before B", but then
> also asking for "stop B" while preventing "stop A".
> So the admin is making incompatible demands, which one do you want us to
> ignore?
It seems that the current Pacemaker does shutdown in spite of
unmanaged resource
