>> Actually, it's desirable to "prevent Pacemaker shutdown" if there are >> unmanaged resource, > > What about unmanaged /and/ failed?
To be more specific, if there remains the resource which failed to stop operation and went to the unmanaged status with its on-fail="block" configuration, it would be better to prevent Pacemaker from its shutdown. Is it difficult to discriminate between "unmanaged(stop failure)" and "unmanaged(operational)"? well, stonith-enabled="false" should not be configured... Thanks, Junko _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
