I am out of the office until 25.10.2011.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Pacemaker Digest, Vol
47, Issue 61" sent on 10/20/2011 6:30:40 PM.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
___
Pacemak
Hi Alan,
Thank you for comment.
We reproduce a problem, too and are going to send a report.
However, the problem does not reappear for the moment.
Best Regards,
Hideo Yamauchi.
--- On Thu, 2011/10/20, Alan Robertson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've seen a very similar problem in a recent release. In f
Looks like do_ha_control() is calling corosync specific functions when
only support for heartbeat is being built.
They'd just need to be #ifdef'd out.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Nikita Michalko
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the next problem I need help ;-(
> PM Version: 1.1.5 (Pacemaker-1-1-c86cb93c
still having issues
this is the correct behavior
Filesystem[3785]: INFO: Running stop for /dev/vgoradb/d208i0 on /oracle/d208i0
Filesystem[3786]: INFO: Running stop for /dev/vgoradb/d209i0 on /oracle/d209i0
Filesystem[3785]: INFO: Trying to unmount /oracle/d208i0
Filesystem[3786]: INFO: Trying t
Sending one last reminder that the Corosync mailing list has changed
homes from the Linux Foundation's servers. I have been unable to obtain
the previous subscriber list, so please resubscribe.
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo
The list is called "discuss".
Regards
-steve
On 10/20/2011 07:42 AM, Alan Robertson wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 03:11 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
>> On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
>>> On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would
On 10/20/2011 03:11 AM, Proskurin Kirill wrote:
On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would be desirable.
Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expecte
Hi, Yan
(2011/09/26 17:46), Gao,Yan wrote:
A glance to the transition. After grpPostgreSQLDB3 was assigned to act1,
grpPostgreSQLDB1 was chosen to be processed, and it was assigned to act2
(because it had no preference between act2 and act3). And then
grpPostgreSQLDB2 went to act3.
Thank you fo
Hi all,
the next problem I need help ;-(
PM Version: 1.1.5 (Pacemaker-1-1-c86cb93c5a57.tar.bz2)
- configured with:
configure --prefix=$PREFIX --localstatedir=/var --sysconfdir=/etc --with-
heartbeat --with-stonith --with-pacemaker --with-daemon-user=$CLUSTER_USER --
with-daemon-group=$CLUSTER_GROU
On 10/20/2011 03:15 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
On 10/19/2011 01:50 PM, Alan Robertson wrote:
Hi,
I have an application where having a 12-node cluster with about 250
resources would be desirable.
Is this reasonable? Can Pacemaker+Corosync be expected to reliably
handle a cluster of this size?
If
10 matches
Mail list logo