On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:37 AM, nozawat wrote:
> Hi Dejan
>
> A replies you with non-implement in the following ML.
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/70278
>
> Will not there be the implementation in the future?
There will likely be, yes.
For now its set as a per-op pa
You might find the following helpful:
https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/RGManagerVsPacemaker
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Yingliang Yang wrote:
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I have some questions about pacemaker and gui.
>
> As we know, current verion of pacemaker supports cman.It connects corosync
Yan, could you have a look into this one? Looks related to your
utilisation feaure.
2011/7/26 Yuusuke IIDA :
> Hi, Yan
> Hi, Andrew
>
> I used the function of placement-strategy and found movement to be worried
> about.
>
> There is node "act3" which the resource that became the unmanaged state
Hi Steve,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Steven Dake wrote:
> ...
>
> Yes I will record if I can beat elluminate into submission.
>
> Regards
> -steve
>
>
Did you get to record this talk? I'd also love to see it, but it wasn't
possible for me to catch it live on Friday.
Thanks,
Mark
___
On 08/04/2011 02:04 PM, Sebastian Kaps wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On 04.08.2011, at 20:59, Steven Dake wrote:
>
>> meaning the corosync community doesn't investigate redundant ring issues
>> prior to corosync versions 1.4.1.
>
> Sadly, we need to use the SLES version for support reasons.
> I'll try
