Yan, could you have a look into this one? Looks related to your utilisation feaure.
2011/7/26 Yuusuke IIDA <iiday...@intellilink.co.jp>: > Hi, Yan > Hi, Andrew > > I used the function of placement-strategy and found movement to be worried > about. > > There is node "act3" which the resource that became the unmanaged state > starts. > > The resource that started then in node "act1" broke down and moved. > > I hoped that this inoperative resource moved to node "sby1", but it was not > carried out. > > Is the movement that a resource with other capacity moves in the node that the > resource of the unmanaged state meets capacity right as specifications? > > I want you to revise it to decide placement in consideration of the capacity > of > the unmanaged resource. > > I attach crm_report when a problem happened. > > Best Regards, > Yuusuke > -- > ---------------------------------------- > METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD > > Yuusuke Iida > Mail: iiday...@intellilink.co.jp > ---------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
