05.07.2011 10:05, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Vladislav Bogdanov
> wrote:
>> 05.07.2011 04:44, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> Looks like the VirtualDomain RA isn't correctly implementing stop.
>>> Stop of an undefined domain shouldn't produce an error.
>>
>> Nope, it just c
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
> > * In stonith-ng, cannot control the stonith resource that grouped.(Case 1)
> > * In stonith-ng, cannot control the stonith resource that set the priority
> > which does not group.(Case 2)
>
> Yes, both of these need to be fixed.
> Could you file bugs for
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We confirmed movement of stonith-ng of Pacemaker1.1.
>
> However, stonith-ng does movement unlike stonith of Pacemaker1.0.
>
> * In stonith-ng, cannot control the stonith resource that grouped.(Case 1)
> * In stonith-ng, cannot control the stoni
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Yoshihiko SATO
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> I remade the patch by the means to add to existing logic.
> (attachment : update_log1.patch)
>
> If it is possible, i want to get also the attribute names of XML("name",
> "value") for log analy
Try syslog_facility: none;
Or adjust your syslog-ng filters.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 6:36 AM, eric kapoor wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am having difficulty with the logging in Pacemaker. Although I have set
> the logging, at the moment, to “err” and told it not to write to a file I am
> still getting ha
applied. thanks :-)
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Florian Haas
> # Date 1309937967 -7200
> # Branch stable-1.0
> # Node ID b358c816a1f94b831a48aae6d3f4d65f2655a7d6
> # Parent 29becb3de7bfcb57c7676e99d137865b95667d43
> doc: fix misleading def
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>> On 2011-07-05 00:24, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Andreas Kurz
>>> wrote:
Hello,
In a cluster without stonith enabled (yes I know ) the
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
> On 2011-07-05 00:24, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Andreas Kurz wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> In a cluster without stonith enabled (yes I know ) the monitor
>>> failure of one resource followed by the stop failure o
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Zhidong She wrote:
> Hi Guys, I installed pacemaker 1.0.11, heartbeat in my RHEL5, and when
> I tried to configure the resource, I got below error.
> Do you encounter this issue before and how to resolve?
I'm guessing your version of python-libs is to old to includ
Hi,
We confirmed movement of stonith-ng of Pacemaker1.1.
However, stonith-ng does movement unlike stonith of Pacemaker1.0.
* In stonith-ng, cannot control the stonith resource that grouped.(Case 1)
* In stonith-ng, cannot control the stonith resource that set the priority
which does not group
Hi Yuusuke,
Thanks a lot for the report and the patch!
I somewhat prefer simplifying the policy, like the attached patch.
What do you think about it? Could you please give it a try?
Regards,
Yan
On 06/30/11 16:36, Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> I wrote a patch for Pacemaker-dev to solve
Hi Guys, I installed pacemaker 1.0.11, heartbeat in my RHEL5, and when
I tried to configure the resource, I got below error.
Do you encounter this issue before and how to resolve?
Appriciate your response.
Br,
Zhidong
root@3wbu-ucs104-1 ~]# crm configure
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On 07/07/11 06:23, Jean-Francois Malouin wrote:
Hi,
I want to wipe out my existing cluster config and start afresh, with a
pristine/empty config without actually starting pacemaker -- cluster
is down right now. Is it enough to just remove files in
/var/lib/heartbeat/crm and /var/lib/pengine ?
13 matches
Mail list logo
