Re: [Pacemaker] Multi-site support in pacemaker (tokens, deadman, CTR)

2011-05-15 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2011-05-13T08:54:19, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > No. Because starting/acquiring the resources would still depend on a > > "local" fence of the other side. This is protected against by our > > regular dependencies already. > > > > Or am I missing something still? > Possibly. > Couldn't both sides

[Pacemaker] Active/Active firewall cluster, with load balancing

2011-05-15 Thread CeR
Hi there! I'm looking for some light regarding active/active firewall clustering with load balancing. I heard some references to ldirectord and LVS, but in the first's webpage ( http://horms.net/projects/ldirectord/) there aren't any documentation, and in the LVS site (http://www.linuxvirtualserv