On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
>
>> Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
>>
>> For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP seem more a trouble than
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
>
> For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
>>> so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP seem more a trouble than a solution.
>>> (i.e. twin head) right ?
>>>
>>> In other wo
Hi allI think there is something wrong with cluster communication,result in
node reboot. so I want to use disk heartbeating, I use corosync-1.2.2-1.1.el5
and pacemaker-1.0.9.1-1.el5.is there any guide tell me how to realize disk
heartbeating with corosync and pacemaker?Thanks a lot
_
Dear Mailing List:
My company is investigating the use Pacemaker/Corosync and would like to create
a proof of concept. We need professional services from a hands-on developer
with detailed knowledge of Pacemaker/Corosync, Linux scripting experience, and
general knowledge of the Linux OS. Pleas
Hi,
the packages from rpm-next(64bit) for opensuse 11.3 do not install there (at
least true for 1.1.4 and 1.1.5).
The plugin is in
./usr/lib/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
but should be in
./usr/lib64/lcrso/pacemaker.lcrso
I think the patch below (borrowed from the 'official' packages) cures.
Regards
Ho
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Thank you for comment.
>
>> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running
>> post_notify_start_0?
>> Is that the ordering you're talking about?
>
> Yes.
> I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_
Hi Andrew,
Thank you for comment.
> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running
> post_notify_start_0?
> Is that the ordering you're talking about?
Yes.
I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the
inoperative node.
> If so, then the crmd is a
Andrew Beekhof @ 15/02/2011 04:25 -0300 dixit:
For what I understand, you want the brains of the action at pacemaker,
so VRRP, HSRP or (U)CARP seem more a trouble than a solution.
(i.e. twin head) right ?
In other words, it seems to better align with the solution idea to
have pacemaker decide an
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 9:32 AM, wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We test trouble at the time of the start of the Master/Slave resource.
>
> Step1) We start the first node and send cib.
>
>
> Last updated: Thu Feb 10 16:32:12 2011
> Stack: Heartbeat
> Current DC: srv01 (c7435833-8bc5-43aa-8195-c
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
>>>
>>> -Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
>>> deployments ? (I read something along that line)
>>
>> pretty much
>>
>>
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/FAQ
Hi,
Is there a searchable repository of the list content so I may find
>>> if some of my doubts are already explained ?
>>>
>>
> Answering myself, I found that this (and some related lists) are archived
> and indexed at GossamerThreads,
>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha
> I
Hi all,
We test trouble at the time of the start of the Master/Slave resource.
Step1) We start the first node and send cib.
Last updated: Thu Feb 10 16:32:12 2011
Stack: Heartbeat
Current DC: srv01 (c7435833-8bc5-43aa-8195-c666b818677f) - partition with quorum
Version: 1.0.10-b0266d
On 2011-02-14 22:37, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> Andrew Beekhof @ 14/02/2011 05:44 -0300 dixit:
>>> -Is still the case that Heartbeat is not to be considered for new
>>> deployments ? (I read something along that line)
>>
>> pretty much
>>
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/FAQ#Should_I_Run_Pacemak
13 matches
Mail list logo
