On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:01 PM, <renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Thank you for comment. > >> Perhaps I misunderstood - does the node fail _while_ we're running >> post_notify_start_0? >> Is that the ordering you're talking about? > > Yes. > I think that stonith do not have to wait for post_notify_start_0 of the > inoperative node. > >> If so, then the crmd is already supposed to be smart enough not to bother >> waiting for those actions - perhaps the logic got broken at some point. > > If you need detailed information, give me communication.
Should be enough in the bug, i'll follow up there _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
