Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > >>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > symmetrical-cluster=false > ? nope > > > Why not, I thought in absence of a positive score IP-Addr

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: symmetrical-cluster=false ? >>> >>> nope Why not, I thought in absence of a positive score IP-Address wouldn't start in asymmetric cluster? Thanks, Vadym >> >

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > Why not just include those IPs into groups? Nope. If the second resource isn;t up the IP cant run > > Are there any plans to support groups that can include another groups? No > Basically it's sill those ((colocate( ( A or B) C ) that yo

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

Why not just include those IPs into groups? Are there any plans to support groups that can include another groups? Basically it's sill those ((colocate( ( A or B) C ) that you already mentioned but having an ability to write "group GroupA resB" would be good too. On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:28 AM,

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > symmetrical-cluster=false > ? nope > Cheers, > Vadym > > On Dec 9, 2010 5:09 AM, "Andrew Beekhof" wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: >>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: >>> Hi, >

Re: [Pacemaker] Master Slave resource

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:06 PM, ruslan usifov wrote: > Hi! Thanks for your reply! > > I make some mistakes in configuration, and now i have againt segfault on > lastest sources(pacemaker-1-0_b0266dd5ffa9) : > > Dec  9 16:51:29 storage0 kernel: [  407.923417] pengine[891]: segfault at 8 > ip b77289

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync rpm from cluster.org/rpm repo

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Larry Brigman > wrote: >> Why is there no 1.2.8 corosync rpm in any of the >> http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm repo directories? >> >> It says that the latest version of pacemaker was tested that version here:

Re: [Pacemaker] Master Slave resource

Hi! Thanks for your reply! I make some mistakes in configuration, and now i have againt segfault on lastest sources(pacemaker-1-0_b0266dd5ffa9) : Dec 9 16:51:29 storage0 kernel: [ 407.923417] pengine[891]: segfault at 8 ip b77289b8 sp bfe38120 error 4 in libpengine.so.3.0.0[b771d000+33000] Dec

Re: [Pacemaker] Crowdsourcing - Need a Pacemaker catchphrase

Hi Angelo, Thanks a lot! We are planning to record the English version, of course including your ideas, at the end of the month. Junko 2010/12/7 Angelo Höngens : > Perhaps this gives you some inspiration? (be careful with the exclamation > marks, non-japanese people tend to dislike shouting in

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

symmetrical-cluster=false ? Cheers, Vadym On Dec 9, 2010 5:09 AM, "Andrew Beekhof" wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: >> On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have two groups each located on one node. So GroupA on nodeA and Grou

Re: [Pacemaker] Do I need a resource for a clustered LVM volume group or not?

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:47 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Florian Haas > wrote: > > On 2010-12-08 23:17, Mike Diehn wrote: > >> While I waited to hear back from you, I tried this on our test cluster: > >> > >> # bunch of primitives, then... > >> group Shared-FS

Re: [Pacemaker] Best way to check if PM is alive

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Evgeniy Ivanov > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> What is a best way to check if PM is still alive? > > "ps axf | grep crmd" is one approach It just means that crmd is alive, but doesn't give information about its state

Re: [Pacemaker] Best way to check if PM is alive

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > Hi, > > What is a best way to check if PM is still alive? "ps axf | grep crmd" is one approach > > We tried following approach: there is a softdog timer (max value is > 300s + extra 60s to give PM another chance) initially started and > ch

[Pacemaker] Best way to check if PM is alive

Hi, What is a best way to check if PM is still alive? We tried following approach: there is a softdog timer (max value is 300s + extra 60s to give PM another chance) initially started and checked by third party. Clone named HA_alive fails in monitor (except first time), monitor interval is 200s.

Re: [Pacemaker] Master Slave resource

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:26 PM, ruslan usifov wrote: > hello > > I have 2 node cluster with follow conf: > node storage0 > node storage1 > primitive drbd_web ocf:linbit:drbd \ >     params drbd_resource="web" \ >     op monitor interval="30s" timeout="60s" > primitive iscsi_ip ocf:heartbe

Re: [Pacemaker] Single Node Cluster and Resource Management

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:24 PM, wrote: > Hi there, > I have a requirement to make a single node cluster primarily for resource > monitoring on the local node so that network load balancing from my front > end load balancers works correctly and the node in question fails out due to > either my pub

Re: [Pacemaker] Modeling dependencies

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Zrin Žiborski wrote: > > Hi there, > > I'm browsing through pacemaker documentation and examples for > some days now, but I just do not see if / how it would be possible > to model dependency between resources so that > > - unused resources are automatically stopped

Re: [Pacemaker] colocation that doesn't

On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Alan Jones wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Tim Serong wrote: >> Can you elaborate on why you want this particular behaviour?  Maybe >> there's some other way to approach the problem? > > I have explained the issue as clearly as I know how.  The problem

Re: [Pacemaker] ERROR: crm_abort: clone_update_actions_interleave: Triggered assert at clone.c:1121 : then_action != NULL

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:03 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to ask for help, I'm getting quite lots of those messages: > ERROR: crm_abort: clone_update_actions_interleave: Triggered assert at > clone.c:1121 : then_action != NULL > What do they mean? > I'm getting quite strange clust

Re: [Pacemaker] Colocation / Order question

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Michael Schwartzkopff wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have two groups each located on one node. So GroupA on nodeA and GroupB on >> nodeB. >> >> I want to have a third resource (i.e. IP-Address) make run on any node where

Re: [Pacemaker] corosync rpm from cluster.org/rpm repo

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Larry Brigman wrote: > Why is there no 1.2.8 corosync rpm in any of the > http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm repo directories? > > It says that the latest version of pacemaker was tested that version here: > http://www.clusterlabs.org/wiki/Install#Versions_and_Compatib

Re: [Pacemaker] Do I need a resource for a clustered LVM volume group or not?

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Florian Haas wrote: > On 2010-12-08 23:17, Mike Diehn wrote: >> While I waited to hear back from you, I tried this on our test cluster: >> >>   # bunch of primitives, then... >>   group Shared-FS dlm clvm o2cb vg1 fs1 >>   clone Shared-FS_clone meta interleave="true

Re: [Pacemaker] Do I need a resource for a clustered LVM volume group or not?

On 2010-12-08 23:17, Mike Diehn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Florian Haas > wrote: > > On 12/08/2010 09:34 PM, Mike Diehn wrote: > > > I want > > > to use OCFS2 on an LVM2 logical volume. > > > > Why why why??? > > >