Re: [Pacemaker] Best way to find master node

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Bob Schatz wrote: > Yes it does. Ok. Could you create a bugzilla for this please? I'll make sure it gets fixed. > Here is output from a different cluster which is at the same 1.0.9.1 Pacemaker > version. > > # crm_mon -n -1 > > Last updated: Wed Aug

Re: [Pacemaker] Designated reaction of Pacemaker to monitor-op returning rc=7 (OCF_NOT_RUNNING)

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 4:00 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just (for now) a short question for to make sure I didn't miss anything: >> What's the designated reaction of Pacemaker when a resource agents >> called for

Re: [Pacemaker] error: ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addr: could not parse meta-data

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Angelo Höngens wrote: > On 25-8-2010 8:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> Basically because I left out the libnet dependancy. >> The status of libnet as a viable project has been uncertain lately. > > Perhaps there could be a warning in the FAQ about this? The fact that

Re: [Pacemaker] Quorum disk?

On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ciro Iriarte wrote: > Hi, I'm planning to use OpanAIS+Pacemaker on SLES11-SP1 and would like > to know if it's possible to use a quorum disk in a two-node cluster. > The idea is to avoid adding a third node just for quorum... No. Quorum disks are only possible

[Pacemaker] Quorum disk?

Hi, I'm planning to use OpanAIS+Pacemaker on SLES11-SP1 and would like to know if it's possible to use a quorum disk in a two-node cluster. The idea is to avoid adding a third node just for quorum... Regards, -- Ciro Iriarte http://cyruspy.wordpress.com -- __

Re: [Pacemaker] Designated reaction of Pacemaker to monitor-op returning rc=7 (OCF_NOT_RUNNING)

Am 25.08.2010 16:00, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just (for now) a short question for to make sure I didn't miss anything: >> What's the designated reaction of Pacemaker when a resource agents >> called for monitorin

Re: [Pacemaker] Simple way to prefer resource groups not start on the same node

Hi, On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:30:39AM -0500, Matthew Schlegel wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm] > > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Matthew Schlegel wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > Pacemaker will try to balan

Re: [Pacemaker] Best way to find master node

Yes it does. Here is output from a different cluster which is at the same 1.0.9.1 Pacemaker version. # crm_mon -n -1 Last updated: Wed Aug 25 09:35:51 2010 Stack: Heartbeat Current DC: mg-wd-wcaw30021216-0 (f4e5e15c-d06b-4e37-89b9-4621af05128f) - partition with quorum Version: 1.0.

[Pacemaker] Help controlling target-role additions to the cib after a start or stop of a resource?

The primitive below is part of a group. If the resource (HA1-ip) is start/stop independently of its group, the target-role="Started" is added to the CIB. Is there a way to prevent that from happening? primitive HA1-ip ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \ operations $id="HA1-ip-operations" \ op

Re: [Pacemaker] Simple way to prefer resource groups not start on the same node

> -Original Message- > From: Dejan Muhamedagic [mailto:deja...@fastmail.fm] > > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Matthew Schlegel wrote: > > Howdy, > > Pacemaker will try to balance the number of resources running on > each node. Not perfect, but there's a good chance t

Re: [Pacemaker] Designated reaction of Pacemaker to monitor-op returning rc=7 (OCF_NOT_RUNNING)

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote: > Hi, > > just (for now) a short question for to make sure I didn't miss anything: > What's the designated reaction of Pacemaker when a resource agents > called for monitoring a resource, which is supposed to run and thus > resultin

Re: [Pacemaker] Simple way to prefer resource groups not start on the same node

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:54:58AM -0500, Matthew Schlegel wrote: > Howdy, > > > > I am working on setting up a farm of mysql servers using > heartbeat/pacemaker to control failover and resource location. Each > particular mysql server is independent, and when resources are > available,

Re: [Pacemaker] error: ocf:heartbeat:IPv6addr: could not parse meta-data

On 25-8-2010 8:36, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > Basically because I left out the libnet dependancy. > The status of libnet as a viable project has been uncertain lately. Perhaps there could be a warning in the FAQ about this? The fact that the binary package misses a very important (to some) module is

Re: [Pacemaker] How-to prevent target-role events from being added to the live CIV?

Hi, On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 01:06:04PM -0500, Vince Gabriel wrote: > The primitive below is part of a group. If the resource (HA1-ip) is > start/stop independently of its group, the target-role="Started" is > added to the CIB. Is there a way to prevent that from happening? Well, that's the way it

Re: [Pacemaker] pacemaker in rhel6

On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On Aug 9, 2010, at 3:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> yes, its fixed in -6 >> > > I wasn't able to find "updates" repository for rhel6. Is it available? I'm not sure how updates are handled prior to GA. I think they do respins occasionally

Re: [Pacemaker] ocf:pacemaker:o2cb Unable to connect to CKPT

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Michael Fung wrote: > Hi All, > > > I am still testing with the Debian Squeeze machine. > > Unable to start the RA ocf:pacemaker:o2cb > > If I run "ocfs2_controld.pcmk -D": > > ocfs2_controld[14510]: 2010/08/06_20:40:03 info: > init_ais_connection_once: Creating con