Am 25.08.2010 16:00, schrieb Dejan Muhamedagic: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:19:23PM +0200, Cnut Jansen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just (for now) a short question for to make sure I didn't miss anything: >> What's the designated reaction of Pacemaker when a resource agents >> called for monitoring a resource, which is supposed to run and thus >> resulting in a return of 0 (OCF_SUCCESS), returns 7 (OCF_NOT_RUNNING)? >> Shall Pacemaker's very next call be for stopping the resource or shall >> it be yet another (or even several) monitorings? > > It should be stop, followed by start, either on the same node or > on another depending on the migration-threshold setting and > failcount.
Ok, that's what I expected. So there are neither so-far-unknown-to-me circumstances where it's by design that Pacemaker - after having gotten a rc=7 from the RA; and for adding a "FAILED" behind the resource in crm_mon, it obviously also understood it correctly - calls the RA yet another several times for monitoring (while letting the rest of the cluster hang) before finally calling the desired stop, instead of immediately calling the RA for stopping and continueing with the pending transactions and migrations. I'll first try to reproduce that on my cluster at home too, reduce the configuration to reproductional minimum and then might give a more detailed description for this issue. >> Or are there various designated reactions to this case, depending on >> various conditions or something? > > This is the default. You can change it by setting the "on-fail" > attribute for the monitor (or any other) operation. Allowed values are [ignore, block, restart, stop, fence], default is restart, and there's no value, option or whatever like on-fail="repeat-op[-N-times]" or something, right? (btw., jfyi: migration-thresholds are currently completely banned out of my configurations, so this is another issue; I probably also might have yet another issue / possible bug regarding zombie-(monitor-)operations, with symptoms like of an off-by-one-error) > > Thanks, > > Dejan > >> Cnut Jansen >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org >> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker >> >> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org >> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf >> Bugs: >> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: > http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker > _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
