Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-24 Thread Gerald Young
un...@otrs.org [mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org] *Im Auftrag > von *Gerald Young > *Gesendet:* Montag, 24. März 2014 12:18 > > *An:* User questions and discussions about OTRS. > *Betreff:* Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field > > > > > this starts fal

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-24 Thread Rudolf Bargholz
rg> [mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org<mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org>] Im Auftrag von Rudolf Bargholz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2014 16:44 An: Stein Erik Berget; User questions and discussions about OTRS. (otrs@otrs.org<mailto:otrs@otrs.org>) Betreff: Re: [otrs] Send notification based on

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-24 Thread Gerald Young
exed fields. In the end > I decided against this option. > > > > Hope this explains our problem. > > > > Regards > > > > Rudolf > > > > *Von:* otrs-boun...@otrs.org [mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org] *Im Auftrag > von *Gerald Young > *Gesendet:* Samst

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-24 Thread Rudolf Bargholz
stions and discussions about OTRS. Betreff: Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field Rudolf, why isn't the standard reply adequate for this purpose? You can propose a template that includes all the Body-necessary fields and send to .. whomever you need. On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-21 Thread Gerald Young
t; > > > Regards > > > > Rudolf > > > > *Von:* otrs-boun...@otrs.org [mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org] *Im Auftrag > von *Rudolf Bargholz > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. März 2014 16:44 > *An:* Stein Erik Berget; User questions and discussions about OTRS. ( > o

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-18 Thread Rudolf Bargholz
questions and discussions about OTRS. (otrs@otrs.org) Betreff: Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field Hi Sten, Thanks for responding. In the course of a ticket there could be more than one situation in which a patch of the production software would be necessary, so there could be

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-13 Thread Rudolf Bargholz
: Donnerstag, 13. März 2014 15:51 An: User questions and discussions about OTRS. (otrs@otrs.org); Rudolf Bargholz Betreff: Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 15:26:35 +0100, Rudolf Bargholz mailto:bargh...@onlinetravel.ch>> wrote: Hi, Our requirement

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-13 Thread Gerald Young
; > > Regards > > > > Rudolf > > > > *Von:* otrs-boun...@otrs.org [mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org] *Im Auf**trag > von *Gerald Young > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. März 2014 15:37 > *An:* User questions and discussions about OTRS. > *Betreff:* Re: [otrs] Send notifi

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-13 Thread Rudolf Bargholz
[mailto:otrs-boun...@otrs.org] Im Auftrag von Gerald Young Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. März 2014 15:37 An: User questions and discussions about OTRS. Betreff: Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field OTRS Version? Summary: How can we provide a notification event of a new Article

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-13 Thread Renee B
On 13.03.2014 15:37, Gerald Young wrote: > OTRS Version? > > Summary: How can we provide a notification event of a new Article if > DynamicField_myField = [Some Value]. > > Short Answer: You can't. > > Longer answer: If you need to inform the customer, send a reply. Or develop your own Perl module

Re: [otrs] Send notification based on article dynamic field

2014-03-13 Thread Gerald Young
OTRS Version? Summary: How can we provide a notification event of a new Article if DynamicField_myField = [Some Value]. Short Answer: You can't. Longer answer: If you need to inform the customer, send a reply. On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Rudolf Bargholz wrote: > Hi, > > > > Our require