Re: [otrs] rpc.pl vs nph-genericinterface.pl

2013-07-25 Thread Michiel Beijen
rpc.pl is the 'old' style XML over RPC interface. the nph-genericinterface.pl is the 'new' pure SOAP interface. - Using RPC you can integrate directly with a part of the backend OTRS APIs which are relatively low level, using the Generic Interface you can use a bit higher level operation

Re: [otrs] rpc.pl vs nph-genericinterface.pl

2013-07-25 Thread Never Min
http://wiki.otterhub.org/index.php?title=Create_a_ticket_in_OTRS_from_PHP_via_RPC what is version of your OTRS, hope this is you need. -Never 2013/7/26 Cyrille Bollu : > Hi list, > > When trying to access OTRS via SOAP, which one should I use? rpc.pl or > nph-genericinterface.pl? > > The later

[otrs] rpc.pl vs nph-genericinterface.pl

2013-07-25 Thread Cyrille Bollu
Hi list, When trying to access OTRS via SOAP, which one should I use? rpc.pl or nph-genericinterface.pl? The later is better documented but support fewer operations than the former... What's best? Regards, Cyrille - OTRS

[otrs] New Notification created but not being displayed under AgentNotifications

2013-07-25 Thread Darshak Modi
I created New event notification for TIcketClose but its not being displayed under Agent Notification links. I do not see any error in RebuldConfig also. -- --- Darshak Modi | Telecom Practices Call- 079-26405600 Ext-1210

Re: [otrs] Move OTRS 3.2.9 to other server with different OS

2013-07-25 Thread Bogdan Iosif
I run a stable v3.2.3 on Windows 2008 R2 with 20+ agents and 100+ customers always connected in a virtual machine running on Hyper-V on a 4 year old real machine. OTRS is stable but sometime you can run into surprises when you try to upgrade (search the mailing list to see my recent failed adventur

Re: [otrs] Move OTRS 3.2.9 to other server with different OS

2013-07-25 Thread Gerald Young
The best option is the one you can support. The general consensus is probably that Linux would be less problematic over time, especially via upgrade paths, but that's not to say people haven't had success on Windows. "is it easy to move OTRS to another server?" Depends. Conceptually, it's ... inst

Re: [otrs] Upgrade path from 3.0 to 3.2 - questions

2013-07-25 Thread Bogdan Iosif
in theory it's possible. in practice... i don't know. i run on windows and app upgrade takes 5 min. seems like a small price to pay in order to test 3.1 upgrade is valid. On Jul 25, 2013 4:11 PM, "Paul Simons" wrote: > Hi Bogdan > > So your answer begs the question; > > Can I just do the upgrade

[otrs] Move OTRS 3.2.9 to other server with different OS

2013-07-25 Thread Erik van Ast
Hi all, We have OTRS 3.2.9 running on an OpenSUSE 11.2 server, but we want to have OTRS running on a different server. The preferred OS for us is Windows, but I don't know if running OTRS on Windows (2003/2008) is as reliable as running on Linux, so my first question is, what is the best opt

Re: [otrs] Upgrade path from 3.0 to 3.2 - questions

2013-07-25 Thread Paul Simons
Hi Bogdan So your answer begs the question; Can I just do the upgrade path on the database and skip the ‘app’ bit? ___ Paul Simons Disclaimer: This e-mail (and any attachments to it) is confidential and intended solely f

Re: [otrs] Upgrade path from 3.0 to 3.2 - questions

2013-07-25 Thread Bogdan Iosif
You must go through 3.1 at least for the database. Just to be safe, I would perform a normal and complete upgrade to 3.1 as described in 3.1's UPGRADING document. Then check the app runs OK - perhaps create a VM snapshot at this point - and then proceed to upgrade to 3.2. /bogdan On Thu, Jul 25,

[otrs] Upgrade path from 3.0 to 3.2 - questions

2013-07-25 Thread Paul Simons
I am running version 3.0.1 (CentOS and PostgreSQL 8.1) and I want to upgrade to the latest version 3.2.9. In fact I am building a completely new system and decommissioning the old hardware. Do I have to follow the upgrade path 3.0 > 3.1 > 3.2 or is there an easier way? I only want to keep the tic