Support.
Linda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of Melinda Shore
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:16 AM
> > To: opsawg@ietf.org
> > Subject: [OPSAWG] Call for adoption, draft-krishnan-opsawg-large-
> flow-
> >
Support!
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Melinda Shore
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 3:07 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Op
Agree with what David said. As of the now the "survey questions and answers"
described in the draft doesn't have any tangible actions/impacts.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:34 PM
To: W
nce data or
report out of NSF.
Also copy to the I2NSF relevant IETF WGs: I2RS, NETMOD, NETCONF, SACM, MILE,
PCP, DOTS, SFC, and OpAreas, in hope to get feedback and suggestions from wider
audience.
Thanks in advance,
Linda Dunbar
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...
Support,
Linda Dunbar
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Warren Kumari [mailto:war...@kumari.net]
> 发送时间: 2015年6月25日 21:05
> 收件人: opsawg@ietf.org;
> draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for...@tools.ietf.org
> 主题: Call for Adoption: draft-you-opsawg-capwap-separation-for-mp
>
>
em might not have a route to Bob, or Bob's routing system might not have a
route to Alice.
Comment to "FW SHOULD NOT attempt to perform any kind of DPI":
Many modern FWs do perform DPIs. Are you saying they should be strip off
the network? They all had legitimate
Fernando,
Thank you very much for the reply.
The section 4 & 5 of the draft are really good.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 6:24 PM
To: Linda Dunbar; Panos Kampanakis (pkampana); opsawg@ietf.org
Cc:
Melinda,
Thank you very much for explaining the intent of the draft. I find the rule
categories described by Section 4 and 5 are very useful. As you mentioned the
possibility of I2NSF WG to be created, I think the Section 4&5 provides a good
design consideration for the types of rules to FW.
, but a little disappointed of not finding the information
I was looking for.
Linda Dunbar
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 7:51 AM
To: op...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: s...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Feedback
Dan,
Thank you very much for bringing attention to this draft.
What being proposed by the draft is almost like ES-IS protocol, isn't it?
I think it is quite useful.
Thanks, Linda Dunbar
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
Sent: Monday, Februa
]
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 9:06 AM
To: Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL; Linda Dunbar; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] automatic attachment of applications and services at the
edge
The problem is scaling. Or one of the problems. Overloading the routing
protocol with service/application
Adrian,
Does your draft intend to cover model for all possible services? Such as
Private Line service?
Simple vanilla IP Internet access services, SD-WAN services, or others?
As of now, the draft is primarily on L3VPN services. Is it intended? Or to be
expanded to more?
Linda
-Original
P tunnels. Those private overlay networks not only
interconnect those sites by secure IP tunnels but can also enforce the client
specified policies to govern how applications or hosts within those sites
communicate and how to access public internet.
Thank you
gestions on potenial work listed in the draft.
Thank you very much.
Linda Dunbar
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
for the egress
nodes.
Linda Dunbar
From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ram Krishnan
Sent: 2016年12月30日 6:41
To: Zhoutianran ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] FW: FW: WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts
Hi Tianran,
I can see the new draft playing predominantly a
ners (fbrockne) [mailto:fbroc...@cisco.com]
Sent: 2017年1月3日 7:43
To: Linda Dunbar ; Ram Krishnan ;
Zhoutianran ; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] FW: FW: WG adoption poll for In-Situ OAM drafts
Hi Linda,
thanks for supporting
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brockners-inband-oam-requirem
Joel,
As I stated in my earlier email, I think the in-band OAM is important area to
work on.
Just want to make sure that the proposed charter has room for other people to
contribute alternative mechanisms that are not exactly same as the drafts
currently being published.
Linda
-Origin
Alvaro,
It is great to see a mailing list being created for interested parties to
discuss.
Question on the objectives of the mailing list:
In-situ OAM (IOAM) provides real-time telemetry of individual data packets and
flows. It is based on telemetry information which is embedded along within da
David,
Will PANIC initiative cover the "security posture" for "workload" moved to 3rd
party cloud DC?
Just finished attending ONUG (Open Network User Group - an enterprise centric
forum) Spring meeting. Many enterprise users are saying that they are moving
their workload to multiple Cloud DC
Yes/Support
Linda Dunbar
-邮件原件-
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Tianran Zhou
发送时间: 2017年6月5日 9:55
收件人: opsawg@ietf.org
抄送: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
主题: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained-06
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest
Med,
Thank you very much for the explanation.
It would be nice to add the explanation to the draft.
Linda
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Date: Wednesday, January 4, 2023 at 8:06 AM
To: Linda Dunbar , gen-...@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-sap@ietf.org ,
last-c...@ietf.org , opsawg
I support the adoption!
Linda Dunbar
From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of
christian.jacque...@orange.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 9:28 AM
To: thomas.g...@swisscom.com; jclarke=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org;
opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION: An Update to the tcpControlBits IP
o signal a large number of routes being
changed to remote PE nodes as quickly as possible.
-
Thank you very much
Linda Dunbar
___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
& effectively
propagate fault notifications to all the involved entities when a large number
of apps being impacted by a site failure or degradation.
Thanks, Linda
From: Hesham ElBakoury
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 11:34 AM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: opsawg ; rt...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Sol
s exceeding. Will you add more?
Thanks, Linda
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 2:02 PM
To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; RTGWG (rt...@ietf.org) ;
draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org
Subject: RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement
Med,
Som
running issues and ensures that both BGP
peers operate with synchronized and compatible settings.
Thanks, Linda
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Monday, December 11, 2023 12:39 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; RTGWG (rt...@ietf.org)
; draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement@ietf.org
Cc
see if there are data models already specified by Ops Area for
monitoring network functions which might have some common attributes that I2NSF
can import.
Thanks, Linda Dunbar
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong [mailto:jaehoon.p...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 6:35 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
t.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2018 5:22 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: i2...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] is there any work in Ops Area for monitoring network
functions?
Linda
I looked at the draft and think that it needs some work before it is a YANG
module:-)
- NMDA conforman
urden to derive the detailed
executable service model from the high level requirement from User Community. I
think a more realistic method is to bring the IETF service modes to MEF and
ONUG to be validated.
Best Regards,
Linda Dunbar
___
OPSAWG mailing l
Support,
Linda Dunbar
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Tianran Zhou [mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com] Envoyé : mardi 29
> octobre 2019 02:44 À : opsawg@ietf.org Cc : opsawg-cha...@ietf.org;
> draft-wu-model-driven-management- virtualization.auth...@ietf.org
> Objet :
Support,
Linda Dunbar
From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2019 11:27 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption call for draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-09
Hi WG,
On IETF 106
I support the WGLC for draft-opsawg-ntf.
Linda Dunbar
From: Tianran Zhou mailto:zhoutian...@huawei.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 7:42 PM
To: opsawg mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>>
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-...@ietf.org>
Subject: WGLC fo
Oscar,
Thank you very much for the link. We will study it to see if the proposed
ACL extension is enough for the Telcom Cloud Controller. If Yes, the ACL
augmentation work can be removed from the NeoTec.
Thanks, Linda
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 8:57 AM OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS <
oscar.gonzalezded...@t
Oscar,
Thanks for the link. We have revised the draft, especially the Dynamic ACL
section, to reflect the ACL extension YANG model that you have suggested:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dunbar-neotec-net-adjust-cloud-scaling/
Your comments and suggestions are greatly appreciated.
Linda
Med,
I really like your proposed new name: Networks for Cloud Operations
(Net4CloudOps).
Since we are talking dynamic policies to the Network controller to
accommodate services hosted in clouds, does NetOps4Clouds also work?
Linda
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 7:03 AM wrote:
> Hi Chongfeng, Linda,
Med,
Thank you very much for the comments and the suggested new names.
Can you please review the answers, the resolutions and the proposed changes
to your comments inserted below?
Thank you,
Linda
.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 7:03 AM wrote:
> Hi Chongfeng, Linda, all,
>
>
>
> (ccing CATS/OPSAWG
Med and Neotec (NetOps4Clouds) participants:
I uploaded the revised charter to the GitHub:
https://github.com/xiechf974/NeoTec/compare/main...lindadunbar:NeoTec:patch-1
Linda
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 11:45 AM Linda Dunbar wrote:
> Med,
>
> Thank you very much for the comments and the
Med,
Is it correct that the “between peer controllers/orchestrater” depicted in the
Figure 3 of draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-18 refers to interactions
between Customer Controller and Provider controller? Are these models
“between peer controllers” only for provisioning?
“Connect
Med, Chong Feng,
I would like to add a few points on the Relationship between AC being discussed
in OPSAWG and the NeoTec:
* AC focuses on the interface connecting the CE to the PEs for delivering
specific services.
* NeoTec focuses on the interface between Network Controller and Clou
Bo and Co-authors of the AC:
I have some questions regarding how the Attachment Circuit YANG model
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ )
could be used to support a simplified version of the use case described in
China telecom’s Neotec side meeting (
htt
Med,
Following your suggestion during IETF 122 for us to take a simple Neotec use
case and "do our homework" by applying existing IETF YANG models-specifically
the Attachment Circuit model- we've completed an initial exercise and
documented it in the following draft:
"Applicability of Attachment
The draft presents a compelling approach to securing YANG data through COSE
signatures.
I support the WG adoption, with the following questions and suggestions to the
draft:
* The draft is a bit general about where and how the provenance mechanism
would be applied - is it just for device
requests to the edge PE using AC YANG model.
What do you think?
Linda
From: Xueting Li
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2025 11:21 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: neotec ; Linda Dunbar ; opsawg
; mohamed.boucadair ; jmh.direct
; mjethanandani
Subject: Re: [neotec] Re: Feedback Wanted_ Is Attachment Circuit YANG
Luis from Telefonica.
You have a good point. We should expand the draft to include scenarios
where the network dynamically adapts to changes in cloud service
deployments, such as AI model scaling or migration.
Thanks, Linda
You feedback will be highly appreciated.
>
> Regards
> Fan
>
&g
Wei
>
> ---Original---
> *From:* "Linda Dunbar"
> *Date:* Fri, Apr 18, 2025 10:32 AM
> *To:* "neo...@ietf.org";"'opsawg'";"
> mohamed.boucad...@orange.com";
> *Cc:* "Joel Halpern Direct";"Mahesh
> Jethanandani";
&g
; In this case， how to adjust network priority to accommodate AI flow? What
> API are available? What your models are available?
>
>
> Xueting
>
> -- Original --
> Linda Dunbar
> **
> **
> **
> **
> To:neo...@ietf.org;&#
quot;AI inference service X")—which can be
interpreted as a service instance identifier similar to the CS-ID used in
the CATS architecture—with network traffic that should receive enhanced
treatment.*
Linda
>
> Best regards
> Chongfeng
>
>
> *From:* Linda Dunbar
> *Date:* 2025-0
Dear Neotec and OPSAWG participants,
We are seeking feedback and comments on our new draft:
draft-dunbar-neotec-ac-pe2pe-ucmp-applicability:
Abstract:
This document explores how existing IETF YANG data models can be applied to a
use case involving dynamic, time-scoped UCMP (Unequal Cost Multipath
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Has Nits
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
Document editor
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry
Title: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Has Nits
I have reviewed this document as part of the SEC area directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents
51 matches
Mail list logo
