It appears that Randy Bush said:
>not positive this i sthe best wg. but regexr is about epp etc.
I agree that this is worth thinking about, but this draft feels like it either
says too much or too little.
>From the too little angle, what do the URLs point to? Will they
all be CSV files with
It appears that Randy Bush said:
>chairs,
>
>can we please get a ten minute speaking slot in dublin for
>
>Name: draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths
>Revision: 01
>Title:Publishing End-Site Prefix Lengths
>Date: 2024-10-16
>Group:Individual Submission
>Pages
It appears that Vasilis Giotsas said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>I'm also supportive of this draft, I think it can be very useful if widely
>adopted.
>
>One issue that some of my colleagues identified is the following:
>There are malicious ASNs out there who acquire huge amounts of IP6 space
>(like multiple
It appears that Joe Clarke (jclarke) said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>As the IPR poll has concluded (no IPR has been reported), the authors and
>chairs would like to call for adoption of
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gasser-opsawg-prefix-lengths/ . Please
>reply on-list with comments, support fo
It appears that Oliver Gasser said:
>We have now published -02, which incorporates John's comments and some
>more changes, mainly:
>
>- Added third field in the CSV file for CGNAT scenarios
>- Added detailed prefixlen examples for different scenarios
>- Added one more example to the Security Con
