[OPSAWG]A few nits regarding draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-05

2024-08-27 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, I have read draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-05 and would like to point out a few nits with suggestions for improvements: * Section 3.2, item "Reference": The description seems somewhow mangled, perhaps replace it with: "Indicates a document as authoritative reference for the LinkType,

[OPSAWG]Re: New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-opsawg-rpsl-extref-00.txt

2024-10-21 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi, the links from the draft for [INET6NUM] and [INETNUM] do not work for me, they result in 404 errors. There are descriptions of both [INET6NUM][1] and [INETNUM][2] on the RIPE web site, but I do not know if they provide the information intended for the reference section. [1]: https://docs.db

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-06.txt

2024-11-22 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Michael, On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 05:31:38PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > [...] > 2) the overwide table has been replaced with stanza. This was suggested >after consultation with the RPC and IANA (in person). (I will >provide an appropriate .xml format file to them at the right p

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-06.txt

2024-11-23 Thread Erik Auerswald
Hi Michael, On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 10:34:31AM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > > https://www.sandelman.ca/tmp/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype.html > Is this better for you? Yes, this HTML rendering looks OK. Cheers, Erik ___ OPSAWG mailing list --