Dear Tim and Martin (cc: opsawg wg),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm for us? Please
see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm/
The due date is 17 October 2
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang/
The due date is Decemb
Hi Martin and Tim (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML ns registry, can you review the
proposed registrations in draft-ietf-opsawg-sap for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sap/
If these are OK, when the IESG approves the document for publi
Dear Bernie Volz and Tomek Mrugalski (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the RADIUS Attributes Permitted in DHCPv6 RADIUS
Option registry, can you review the proposed registration in
draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-o
Dear Tim and Martin (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access/
The due date is March 14, 2023.
If this is OK, when t
Dear Mark (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated expert for the Well-Known URIs registry, can you review the
proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access for us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access/
The due date is March 14, 2023.
If this is OK, when
Dear IE Doctors (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IPFIX Information Elements registry, can you
review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh for us?
Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/
The due date is May 16th, 2
Dear IE Doctors (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IPFIX Information Elements registry, can you
review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update-05 for us?
Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc7125-update/
The due date is Novembe
Dear Martin Thomson and Tim Bray (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls-13 for us? Please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls/
The due date is March 12th.
If this is OK, w
Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs,
Please see below for feedback from the experts.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Wed May 08 09:42:20 2024, pait...@ciena.com wrote:
>
> * 3. UDP Options at a Glance
>
> Add "to" :
>
> e.g., to discover a path MTU or share timestamps
>
>
>
>
Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs,
Please see below for feedback from the experts.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Wed May 08 09:42:59 2024, pait...@ciena.com wrote:
>
> * 1.1
>
> Add "the":
>
> Section 3 addresses these issues. Also, the ipv6ExtensionHeaders
> IPFIX
> IE is
Dear Authors/Chairs/ADs,
Please see below for feedback from the experts for this document.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Wed May 08 09:42:14 2024, pait...@ciena.com wrote:
> This document is simply too long to review. I'm about half way
> through, and will not have ti
Hi Paul,
Following up on the remaining review for this document.
Thank you very much.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Mon May 13 13:22:17 2024, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for the review. The changes can be tracked at: Diff: draft-
> i
Hi Paul,
Following up on this document as well.
Thank you for performing the reviews.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Tue May 14 05:21:33 2024, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for double checking.
>
> I don’t think there is a conflict betwee
Hi Paul,
Following up on this document as well.
Thank you for performing the reviews.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Tue May 14 12:48:27 2024, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> The new version with all received reviews and comments is available
> at:
Dear IE Doctors (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IPFIX Information Elements registry, can you
review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-12 for
us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix/
The due date is June 2
Dear IE Doctors,
I apologize, please disregard this request. This new Last Call is in place for
the changes made during the previous review process.
Thank you.
Best regards,
David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist
On Tue Jun 11 19:52:18 2024, david.dong wrote:
> Dear IE Doctors (cc: opsawg WG
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-11 for us?
Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/
The due date
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-18 for
us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/
T
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-14 for
us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/
The
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the IETF XML Registry registry, can you review
the proposed registration in draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-13 for us? Please
see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/
The due date is Dec
Dear Tim Bray, Martin Thomson (cc: opsawg WG),
As the designated experts for the ns registry, can you review the proposed
registration update in draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-11 for us? Please
see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/
The due date is Ju
Dear IE Doctors (cc: opsawg wg),
As the designated experts for the IPFIX Information Elements, can you review
the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-19 for
us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry/
The due date i
Dear Greg Mirsky, Michael Scharf (cc: opsawg wg),
As the designated experts for the Performance Metrics Registry, can you review
the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-19 for
us? Please see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemet
ences to
> [I-D.zhou-ippm-enhanced-alternate-marking] and
> [I-D.fz-spring-srv6-alt-mark] must be normative, if the Alternate
> Marking
> method is in the scope of the document.
>
> I hope that my comments are helpful.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025
as there is only one follow-up posting. For instance,
> RFC 7799 Section 3.8 doesn't really define a combination of "Hybrid I"
> and "Passive", as far as I read the text of RFC 7799. But Greg has
> probably more context regarding that discussion.
>
> Best regard
se let me know if that is
> acceptable to you.
>
> Regards,
> Greg
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 12:39 PM David Dong via RT <
> drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Just a ping on this one if you're availabl
27 matches
Mail list logo
