[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)

2025-03-02 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Thanks, Thomas. -14 addressed my review concerns, and I see that the OAM terminology reference is removed here in -15. I think it’s in Giuseppe’s hands now to produce the write-up, and then we can move forward. Perhaps one nit in your definition of the Encapsulating Node…since the decap node

[OPSAWG]Re: [spring] Re: Fw: New Version Notification for draft-liu-opsawg-ipfix-path-segment-00.txt

2025-03-02 Thread liu.yao71
Hi Changwang, Path segment is put at the last entry(e.g, segment list[N]) in the SRH. But there's no convenient method if we only want to export segment list[N]. Leveraging RFC9487, the last entry can be carried via srhSegmentIPv6ListSection/srhSegmentIPv6BasicList, but in this way , the whole

[OPSAWG]Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-14

2025-03-02 Thread מנחם דודג'
Hello Thomas, Thank you kindly for your email and the explanations. Yes thank you, this has addressed my concerns. Best Regards, Menachem ‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 27 בפבר׳ 2025 ב-16:40 מאת <‪thomas.g...@swisscom.com‬‏>:‬ > Dear Menachem, > > Thanks a lot for the review and apologies for delayed repli