[OPSAWG]Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: Publishing End-Site Prefix Lengths

2025-01-21 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi all, This document solves a real problem. I support adoption. Cheers, Med PS: When reviewing the document for this call, I figured out that I might be aware of an IPR that might cover this contribution. I will double check internally and, if my assessment is confirmed, a formal disclosure w

[OPSAWG]Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Erik, Thanks for the comments. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Erik Kline via Datatracker > Envoyé : lundi 20 janvier 2025 22:19 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circ...@ietf.org; opsawg- > cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; > lui

[OPSAWG]Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-14: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refe

[OPSAWG]Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread Paul Wouters via Datatracker
Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Pl

[OPSAWG]Re: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-15: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Erik, > ## Comments > > ### S5.4 > > * Should there be any mention of Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB) > in here, > or would that go somewhere else as a network operations > implementation > detail? That's more a service that can be bound to ACs. Some PBB matters on PEs are already cov

[OPSAWG]Re: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit-19: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Paul, Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Paul Wouters via Datatracker > Envoyé : mardi 21 janvier 2025 22:07 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circ...@ietf.org; opsawg- > cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; > luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@t

[OPSAWG]Re: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac-14: (with COMMENT)

2025-01-21 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Paul, Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Paul Wouters via Datatracker > Envoyé : mardi 21 janvier 2025 21:52 > À : The IESG > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common...@ietf.org; opsawg- > cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; rro...@ciena.com; > rro...@ciena.com >