[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture"

Hi Med, Thank you for your valuable comments and interest in our draft. Below, we have provided explanations and additional clarifications regarding your questions. 1) Consultation with SAVNET WG: Yes, we have discussed with the chair of the SAVNET WG. He advised us to promote this draft within t

[OPSAWG]Re: WG LAST CALL: Export of Delay Performance Metrics in IP Flow Information eXport (IPFIX)

Dear Giuseppe, Thanks a lot for the input. That makes perfectly sense that we also describe the applicability onto the SRv6 Segment Routing Header in the Alternate-Marking Method and mention Alternate-Marking Method when the delay is being calculated outside of the network node. Could you plea

[OPSAWG]Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-00.txt

Hi Authors, all, FWIW, you may find a review of this draft at: * pdf: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/2024/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-00-rev%20Med.pdf * doc: https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/refs/heads/master/2024/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-gtpu-

[OPSAWG]Re: TACACS+ TLS Resumption and PSK.

On Oct 28, 2024, at 7:51 AM, Douglas Gash (dcmgash) wrote: > Rev 11 of the T+ TLS doc had new sections for PSK and resumption, with a > slight restructure to accommodate PKI and PSK in regular hierarchy in the > contents. > > We are currently preparing another rev of the doc, so would be very

[OPSAWG]Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3

Hi Joe, Putting aside the TLS part, what you described for the first point matches the double check I also made on the configuration knobs of various "legacy" implements out there. I'm planning to remove the list from future versions of the doc. Thanks. Cheers, Med De : Joe Clarke (jclarke)