Joe,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks!
Carlos.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:58 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke)
wrote:
> And, of course, I meant ahead of WG LC not adoption.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
> *From: *Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> *Date: *Thursday, October 10, 2024 at 11:57
> *
not positive this i sthe best wg. but regexr is about epp etc.
randy
---
A new version of Internet-Draft draft-ymbk-opsawg-rpsl-extref-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-ymbk-opsawg-rpsl-extref
Revision: 00
Title:Generali
Dear OPSAWG Experts,We have submitted a draft titled "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture" (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cui-savnet-anti-ddos/), which focuses on enhancing security operations to defend against DDoS attacks
The other methods outlined in section 7.5 do not provide this detail. I think
it is incumbent on your draft to state that implementations, regardless of
approach, document where the metrics are calculated so that meaningful action
can be taken.
Exactly. This must be described in the RFC8911 I
The adoption call has concluded, and there does seem to be support to adopt and
progress this work in opsawg. As pointed out by Benoit, this work is mostly
complete as it is, and the authors have recently copied this to dmm@ per
comments from Med.
Authors, please resubmit this draft as draft-i
