Joe, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks! Carlos. On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 11:58 AM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com> wrote: > And, of course, I meant ahead of WG LC not adoption. > > > > Joe > > > > *From: *Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> > *Date: *Thursday, October 10, 2024 at 11:57 > *To: *opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> > *Cc: *draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterizat...@ietf.org < > draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterizat...@ietf.org> > *Subject: *[OPSAWG]IPR POLL: Guidelines for Charactering "OAM" > > Hello, authors and contributors of draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-oam-characterization/> > (and the WG at large). Ahead of WG adoption, we want to get a lay of the > land in terms of IPR. > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft” > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. > > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > > aware of any relevant IPR. > > > > Please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it. > > > > Joe > > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
