[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture"

2024-10-29 Thread Mingzhe Xing
, who are interested in deploying SAVI and SAV-D devices. We will provide experimental results after testing on their testbed. Thank you once again for your support. Best, Mingzhe Replied Message FromDate10/26/2024 01:52ToMingzhe Xingccops...@ietf.orgSubject[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Commen

[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture"

2024-10-25 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Mingzhe, As the main author of the DOTS telemetry spec, I’m enthusiast to this proposal and would like to see more details/practicalities. I have two logistic-related comments: * Did you checked with SAVNET WG? * Also, it seems to me this was presented in dispatch-all IETF#119. The

[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture"

2024-10-21 Thread Mingzhe Xing
Subject [OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture" Hi Mingzhe,At the minimum, you need to rename the draft to draft-cui-opsawg-savnet-anti-ddos

[OPSAWG]Re: Request for Comments on Draft "SAV-based Anti-DDoS Architecture"

2024-10-21 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Hi Mingzhe, At the minimum, you need to rename the draft to draft-cui-opsawg-savnet-anti-ddos for it to land in the OPSAWG list of documents. Cheers. p.s. I have not read the document, but I hope it addresses how a SAV-D device is better than SAV from an operational and security consideration