[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Tacker uplift to keystone v3

Fwding to opnfv-tech-discuss From: Paraskevopoulos Georgios [mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 3:41 PM To: 'Tim Rozet' ; 'mb...@suse.com' ; 'Juan Vidal ALLENDE' ; 'Jose Lausuch' ; 'Brady Allen Johnson' Cc: &#x

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: Tacker uplift to keystone v3

Fwding to opnfv-tech-discuss From: Paraskevopoulos Georgios [mailto:geo...@intracom-telecom.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 3:41 PM To: 'Tim Rozet' ; 'mb...@suse.com' ; 'Juan Vidal ALLENDE' ; 'Jose Lausuch' ; 'Brady Allen Johnson' Cc: &#x

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Hi Srikanth, I would try switching to Boron SR2 (0.5.2) BR, George From: Srikanth Lingala [mailto:srikanth.ling...@nxp.com] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2017 9:33 AM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios ; Brady Allen Johnson ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; sfc-...@lists.opendaylight.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] ODL SFC with multiple compute nodes

Hi Srikanth, Which ODL version are you using? We had some issues too in Colorado with multicompute setups. BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2017 3:4

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues

Correction. Same healthcheck btw 2 scenarios, It was just buried in the logs From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:57 PM To: Michael Polenchuk ; Jose

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues

Hi all, I want to bring this back to life. In CI healtcheck is failing for SFC scenario because the instances fail to get an IP from DHCP agent [0] In contrast for the BGPVPN scenario healthcheck works [1]. It seems to me they are running a different flavor of healthcheck Michael: Is ther

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

, January 27, 2017 6:17 PM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios Cc: opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Veena Lingadahalli Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found Hi George, The private network is created by default

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

f Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 10:24 AM To: Veena Lingadahalli ; Serg Melikyan ; Tim Rozet Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment PS2: I run a test modif

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

iled to start tacker-server.service: Unit tacker-server.service not found. So we need to change the way the symlink to the service is created BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

[mailto:vlingadaha...@mvista.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 6:44 AM To: Serg Melikyan ; Tim Rozet Cc: Paraskevopoulos Georgios ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Priya Kanaujia ; Aimee Ukasick Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment Hi

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel] Tacker fuel plugin error with Fuel 10 deployment

Hi all, I'm trying to deploy Fuel 10 with Tacker plugin enabled and I'm getting the following error: (/Stage[main]/Tacker::Service/Service[tacker]) Provider upstart is not functional on this host Possibly this is because in Fuel 10 we are using Ubuntu 16.04 with systemd instead of 14.04 w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

br-aux is missing? Can you guide me how to create a private network? Thanks, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:39 PM To: Michael Polenchuk

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

Ok I’ll wait a bit for a Fuel 10 patch. Thanks for your help, George From: Michael Polenchuk [mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 5:34 PM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios Cc: Manuel Buil ; opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Veena

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

, January 27, 2017 5:06 PM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios Cc: Manuel Buil ; opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Veena Lingadahalli Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found Hi George, Thanks for testing it

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

.domain.tld Can you look into it? Thanks, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 2:15 PM To: Michael Polenchuk ; Manuel Buil Cc: opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

: Manuel Buil Cc: brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com; Paraskevopoulos Georgios ; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-us...@lists.opnfv.org; Veena Lingadahalli Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found Hi Manuel, Is dpdk the requirement

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Fuel9.0][vlan] Fuel9.0 deployment failing with br-aux not found

Hi all, I am encountering the same problem in Fuel 10. Do we have any news on this? Thanks, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Michael Polenchuk Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017 9:25 PM To: Veena Lingada

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Keystone error when getting nova client

UPDATE: I cherry-picked this change https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/26061/ and it worked. Kudos to Helen for the quick fix. BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Keystone error when getting nova client

Hi, I just tested and I'm getting the same problem with the latest container (I do docker pull opnfv/functest :latest) and the tip master branch BR, George From: Jose Lausuch [mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2016 5:43 PM To: Paraskevopoulos Geo

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [functest] Keystone error when getting nova client

Hi all, In functest master when I'm trying to run get_nova_client() I'm getting the following exceptions: http://hastebin.com/lokuciquce.hs I run git bisect with the following test: http://hastebin.com/asezuwawoh.js Where test.py tries to get a nova client: http://hastebin.com/fidehufuju.cp

[opnfv-tech-discuss] FW: [netvirt-dev] [sfc-dev] [ovsdb-dev] ovs nsh patches have been ported into ovs 2.6.1

Hi all, I have modified fuel-plugin-ovs to deploy OVS v2.6.1 with the new NSH patches. For now I have a mirror in my personal repo [0] and I’m going to push for an upstream change when everything gets stable. Feel free to use it and ping me for improvements. [0]: https://github.com/georg

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] weekly meeting agenda, November 20, 2016

Performance Profiling presentation available here https://drive.google.com/open?id=0ByKmzUuCWRteZjlsZTZWUU1CRGc BR, George From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Brady Allen Johnson Sent: Wednesday, November 30,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [odl-sfc] Change test names in functest DB

Hi all, Late bird here :) I agree with Juan. Morgan's proposal is what we'll get to eventually, but it's a bit early to establish a rigid naming scheme. Until we have more tests that cover a larger amount of cases I think more descriptive names is the way to go. Also, limiting the numbe

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Meeting minutes, Nov 23, 2016

Hi Manuel, I'd like to take one of SFC-53 / SFC-55. Also I can take SFC-52. BR, George -Original Message- From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Manuel Buil Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 6:13 PM To: Brady Al

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Apex colorado SFC

...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 5:06 PM To: Paraskevopoulos Georgios Cc: Manuel Buil; Brady Allen Johnson; Tim Rozet; OPNFV Tech Subject: Re: OPNFV Apex colorado SFC Hi George, Thanks for reply. I am using OPNFV APEX Colorado which is based on ODL Boron. I checked my security

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] OPNFV Apex colorado SFC

Hi Ahmed, I reproduced your environment and run the test and it works fine for me. Here are the system info in detail: - Controller ovs-vsctl: http://hastebin.com/tibanukeqe.scala - Controller flows: http://hastebin.com/ekeriwofib.lua - Compute1 ovs-vsctl: http:/

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Failing floating IP in Boron

I tested today autorelease 1477 manually and I confirm that SSH via floating IPs works. Link: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/autorelease-1477/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-Boron/ BR, George Paraskevopoulos -Original Message- From: Tim Rozet

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netvirt-dev] [SFC] [Boron] Missing flows in OPNFV SFC testcase

Opened a bug in Bugzilla: https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 George From: netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:netvirt-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Paraskevopoulos Georgios Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:17 PM To: netvirt

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [netvirt-dev] [SFC] Missing flows in OPNFV SFC testcase (Boron RC1)

Hi team, I am currently working with the OPNFV SFC team and I am currently testing the OpenDaylight Boron RC1 release. The testcase I am running is the following: