Correction. Same healthcheck btw 2 scenarios, It was just buried in the logs



From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Paraskevopoulos Georgios
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 12:57 PM
To: Michael Polenchuk <mpolenc...@mirantis.com>; Jose Lausuch 
<jose.laus...@ericsson.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues



Hi all,



I want to bring this back to life. In CI healtcheck is failing for SFC scenario 
because the instances fail to get an IP from DHCP agent [0]

In  contrast for the BGPVPN scenario healthcheck works [1]. It seems to me they 
are running a different flavor of healthcheck



Michael: Is there any progress for this? Can we help to resolve this issue 
somehow?



[0] 
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/1159/console

[1] 
https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/1136/console



BR,

George





From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>  
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Michael 
Polenchuk
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2017 2:58 PM
To: Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com <mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com> >
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues



I've got only the following flows on the compute node (all instance(s) packets 
is being dropped):

# ovs-ofctl dump-flows -OOpenFlow13 br-int
OFPST_FLOW reply (OF1.3) (xid=0x2):
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.647s, table=0, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, 
dl_type=0x88cc actions=CONTROLLER:65535
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.647s, table=0, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=6 actions=goto_table:1
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.648s, table=1, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:11
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.656s, table=11, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:21
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.652s, table=21, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:31
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.648s, table=31, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:41
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.659s, table=41, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:51
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.653s, table=51, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:61
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.650s, table=61, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:71
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.660s, table=71, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:81
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.654s, table=81, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:91
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.651s, table=91, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:101
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.660s, table=101, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=goto_table:111
 cookie=0x0, duration=36399.655s, table=111, n_packets=180, n_bytes=27686, 
priority=0 actions=drop



On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Michael Polenchuk <mpolenc...@mirantis.com 
<mailto:mpolenc...@mirantis.com> > wrote:

Hi,

Definitely need to debug it in details,
but I believe this issue relates to ovs+nsh chains/flows since other scenarios 
pass this test.



On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com 
<mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com> > wrote:

Hi,



Currently there is a bigger problem which happens in CI:

https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-fuel-baremetal-daily-master/1112/console



The instances can’t get an IP from the dhcp agent.



Adding Michail, who together with me has seen that issue before on fuel and 
sometimes was due to bad POD configuration.



Thanks,

Jose





From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>  
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org> ] On Behalf Of Juan Vidal 
ALLENDE
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 17:03 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [SFC] Collecting current issues



Hello,



As we talked in the weekly meeting, let's compile the current issues that we 
are facing, and try to focus on fixing them to stabilize the test cases. We can 
then add them to JIRA and assign them.



I am currently facing two issues:



1) Floating IPs are not working sometimes. I don't know why this happens, 
because manually I can spawn a VM and manually asign IP to it and works fine 
with the admin user, but I seem to have more problems when using the 'tacker' 
user.



2) Wait for ovs configuration goes too fast. After testing 'ssh blocked' 
subtest, 'http works' subtest usually fails. I noticed that if I add a delay of 
10 seconds after 'wait_for_configuration_changes' function, it works. 
Apparently  it takes some time for the rules to be correctly installed.



Are you guys seeing these bugs as well? Do you have some others?



Regards,

Juan





--

  Michael Polenchuk
  Private Cloud / Mirantis Inc.




--

  Michael Polenchuk
  Private Cloud / Mirantis Inc.



_______________________________________________
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Reply via email to