Bryan,
"and others" isn't necessarily required but I have seen instances where
people use it. I think it's helpful incase there are new contributors to
the code in the future (who were not the original authors of the code)
Thanks,
Ray
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:36 AM, Luke Hinds wrote:
>
Hello,
I'm not part of the Barometer project, however I found this thread interesting,
so here's my $0.02 (CAD). On an internal project, we have started evaluating
the use of NATS [1] vs. Kafka for high throughput collection of telemetry. I
don't have any stats collected at this time.
[1] ht
Hi Maryam,
We have just finished a preliminary evaluation of Kakfa + collectd.
On the Kafka side, we have simulated up to 700 servers sending telemetry
data
and have experimented with different broker setups with regards to number
of
partitions, replication factor, etc... What we see is average l
Hello
Another option is
sfc/sfc-test/sfc-docker/sf_hhe/sf_hhe/sf_hhe.py
This is a basic header enrichment nsh enabled SF for testing purposes.
It has many caveats detailed in the parent dir README but may be useful
to some and can be improved.
BR
Jaime.
On jue, 2017-04-20 at 16:54 -0400, Tim R
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:GMT Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T01
T
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Pacific Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T02
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T02000
All,
We have some confusion this morning. I thought I had properly
updated the meeting invite in January to the new meeting codes but Ray's email
this week and checking the wiki seems to show that we should use:
Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.
https
Srikanth,
Its also possible to make the vxlan_tool.py be a firewall by blocking certain
TCP ports. We even setup a demo once using this tool to read any of the NSH
C1-C4 and use them accordingly. In that specific demo we had the classifier put
the symmetric chain id in C3 and when the vxlan_to
Hi Wenjing,
We will participate (host) the next week’s plugfest. A dedicated session on
security is an excellent idea.
Let’s meet together Monday morning to set up it.
BRs,
Ruan HE
From: Wenjing Chu [mailto:wenjing@huawei.com]
Sent: jeudi 20 avril 2017 21:16
To: HE Ruan IMT/OLPS; TECH-DISCUSS
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
E
Hi all:
The dovetail weekly meeting will use the new number:
Here is the new link:
* https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/819733085
thanks ray for cleaning up the gotomeeting account.
Best regards
hongbo
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
E
Hi fellow barometers
I've been looking at the timestamps sent along with the events + stats...
Currently there are 2 scenarios:
1. where the subsystem we are reading from CAN provide us with the time the
sample was collected:
In this case we have the time for the sample/evet and the time co
Hi folks
I will be reducing the call next week to 30mins.
[barometer] Update
* Dev update:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Barometer+Development+Updates
* Test Update:
* E release
* Internally prepared scripts for IPMI functest - nearly complete
* Mastered generating RPM un
I would like to nominate Mika Rautakumpu and Juha Kosonen for the Integration
and Testing category for the great work they have done in especially in the
plugfest. We had a OCP hardware physically present the the Colorado Plogufest
and will have one in the Danube plugfest also. They have been us
Resending this mail as I forgot to add test-wg as receiver.
From: yaohelan
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 2:39 PM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: 'Brandon Wick' ; asay...@redhat.com; Wenjing Chu
; Zhounan (Nan, Std & Industry Dept)
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss][test-wg] Call for ideas
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 5:34 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> Luke, is the “and others.” required? If only one contributor has
> contributed to the code for a module, “and others” seems to be superfluous.
> So far, I have not seen specific guidance that this is required.
>
>
>
I am using the text
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:44 AM, Raymond Paik
wrote:
> Thanks Luke. This is cool...
>
> In case people use the SPDX identifier, could you check for the following
> as well?
>
This should be possible, I will try a few things out.
>
> ###
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2017-04-24
*# QTIP project weekly meeting on -mm-dd*
- time: UTC0730
- irc://#opnfv-qtip@freenode
- index: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings
*## Action followup*
- none
*## Topics*
- weekly updates
- introduc
19 matches
Mail list logo
