On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 03:11:24PM +0100, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> Baptiste Jonglez [2020-11-25 12:41:18]:
>> For the imagebuilder, it increases the *total* build time (not just
>> download time!) by +50%:
>>
>> http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2020-September/031406.html
>
> I don't
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 02:55:05PM +, Ted Hess wrote:
> [T]here must be some sort of criteria (contributions, legitimate
> business site or references) to get your name/outfit listed. And, as
> Daniel said, we don't want to be in the business of certifying
> contractors.
Those two sentences se
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Le sam. 23 janv. 2021 à 18:09, Sam Kuper a écrit :
>> I suggest that if a vote is held, it should be a three-way vote
>> between the following outcomes (which should probably be mutually
>> exclusive):
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 02:47:57PM +0100, Etan Kissling wrote:
> On 08.02.21, 10:33, Rosen Penev wrote:
>>> My patches don't end up in Patchwork for some reason.
>> It's because of DMARC. [..]
>
> Thanks for the hint about DMARC leading to Patchwork issues. [..]
>
> It seems that the OpenWrt mail
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 07:46:47AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:57 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 21:52 -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> They've suggested the mailman admin apply a patch ;)
>>
>> I believe I did so yesterday.
>
> [..] Awesome, thanks.
T
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 10:34:34AM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> Instead of maintaining flyspray and the server, I’d like to export all
> flyspray issues, migrate them to GitHub and open GitHub issues for
> openwrt/openwrt to the public.
Please don't do this. GitHub has substantial accessibility a
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 10:31:01AM -0600, Lao Shaw wrote:
> github is used by so many open source projects and it becomes the de
> facto git repo platform for many,
This is a tragedy.
> what makes openwrt so special to the point that github is not good
> enough and your idea will do better (for
On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 08:02:30PM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Sam Kuper writes:
>> Not everyone has, or can have, a Microsoft (GitHub) account.
>
> Please explain.
>
> These terms are pretty much identical:
>
>
> https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/git
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 03:38:43PM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
> ## Bug Tracker
>
> I looked today into migrating issues from bugs.openwrt.org over to
> GitHub.com, codeberg.org (GiTea) and todo.sr.ht (Sourcehut). [..]
>
> While sr.ht allows to import the large collection of issues, each
> message
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Sergey Ponomarev wrote:
> Speaking about GitHub and access to it from sanctioned territories
> this is a really big concern. [..]
Thank you for corroborating that concern.
Some news reports, think-tank analysis, and legal guidance providers
suggest the cu
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 09:45:52PM +0200, Sergey Ponomarev wrote:
> Well, we may *speculate* and try to minimise risks but that's what I
> tried to say: it's counterproductive.
Avoiding unnecessary risks is productive. It's one of the ways in which
projects and organisations stay afloat.
> A
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Paul Spooren wrote:
>> Must confess: I was unaware of the ~16k issue body character limit...
>
> I discussed this with Drew (sourcehut developer)
Thanks! That means there's a chance it will be documented and, if
possible, fixed/improved.
Incidentally, i
Dear all,
I'm not an OpenWRT dev, just a lurker on the mailing list & a sometime
user of OpenWRT. (Thank you to all the devs & maintainers of OpenWRT &
packages, btw.) So, my view might not count for much, but ...
On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 09:36:03PM -0400, Eric Luehrsen wrote:
> I did a compa
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:37:00PM +0200, bapti...@bitsofnetworks.org wrote:
> 3) organisational: switch to gitlab?
>
>While there was a vote about it,
Hi, do you happen to have a link to that discussion/vote?
>I don't know if this is planned for 20.XX. I think it makes sense:
>we c
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>> The remerged OpenWrt project is legally represented by the Software
>> in the Public Interest (SPI) - an US 501(c)(3) non-profit
>> organization which is managing our OpenWrt
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>> Le lun. 3 août 2020 à 00:04, Rosen Penev a écrit :
>>> Whenever discussion about patents arise, I usually point to Fedora
>>> whose paren
On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 01:21:26PM -0700, Rosen Penev wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:09 AM Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:11:13PM +0300, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>>> Le lun. 3 août 202
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 09:36:08AM +0100, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
> If there is a minority who is unable to use parts of this software,
Worth considering: do we know for sure that it's a minority? And is it
even relevant whether it is a minority or a majority, as long as we know
that some develop
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 01:30:08AM +0100, Mauro Mozzarelli wrote:
> Citizens of the European Union are major contributors to OpenWrt and
> other Open Source projects, The European Union, after several years of
> debate. listened to its citizens, not corporations, and has put into
> law that freedom
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:34:14PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
>> On 2020-10-04, abnoeh wrote:
>>> Few months ago there was some debate for how we handle certificate
>>> for luci page: make user to click though certificate warning is not
>>> that great for sec
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 12:10:17AM +0200, Alberto Bursi wrote:
> On 07/10/20 15:34, abnoeh wrote:
>>> However, I think you are assuming a RA/DHCP-based WAN connection.
>>> For PPPoE (which is still a thing in a lot of places, including
>>> developing world, where last mile is often wifi), this won'
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:44:12PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> These are the ideas I've been thinking about for the future of OpenWrt
> for a while. It looks complete enough to share it with all of you.
> [...]
>
> https://arinc9.notion.site/OpenWrt-next-gen-ideas-6db745e7584b4823950291c96f2326bb
On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 12:59:49PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 15.04.2023 20:02, Sam Kuper wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:44:12PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>> These are the ideas I've been thinking about for the future of
>>> OpenWrt for a while. It looks
On 18 July 2024 09:53:14 UTC, Florian Eckert wrote:
>
> I found a commit [1] in the Linux kernel that makes the USB
> controller probing asynchronous and therefore not deterministic as
> before. I have reverted the commit on my build and now nothing
> changes in the controller numbering. This
24 matches
Mail list logo
