On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:10 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> looking at the patch, this was not the tool that depended on some
> compression lib.
>
> i will have a look in the morning to figure out why i did not merge it
> already :)
>
> sorry for the delay
Bump!
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
http://pgp.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:12 PM, John Crispin wrote:
> a74c1bb5ca2cf9156ac8cf1d3a91cc6759c4d7ad
I missed that, I'm sorry! Thanks again!
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC
___
openwrt-devel m
Hi everyone,
I have a Thomson TG585v8 Amazon-SE device.
The device seems almost identical to the Netgear DGN1000B already in
openwrt, and I'd like to add support for the specific board. But can't
seem to figure out how to do it. I previously added support for a
ralink device but the process seems
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Tomislav Požega
wrote:
> thomson usually sticks with crappy broadcom so don't give much hope for
> AR9271..
It's a Ralink RT3070 it seems!
The console log is here: http://pastebin.com/LCf2rFCv
I didn't take it from my device as I'm having problems with the seria
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Jacek Kikiewicz wrote:
> Well, if boot loader is not supported you have 2 choices:
> 1. Leave it
> 2. Make boot loader supported with some hard work :)
3. replace bootloader with uboot?
Anyways internal pictures are here.
https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:37 AM, James Hilliard
wrote:
> What ISP is this issued by? Do you have a link to this modem on their
> website?
Tiscali Italy
http://assistenza.tiscali.it/tecnica/adsl/configurazioni/thomson_tg585v8/
This is the support page, in Italian.
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
htt
On Oct 18, 2013 1:00 PM, "James Hilliard" wrote:
>
> Does the software appear to be customized at all for the ISP or does it
seem to be generic?
I'm not home at the moment so I cannot grab you some screenshots, but the
interface is exactly the same as the one here taken from my ISP's website:
ht
Any news, James?
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:54 PM, James Hilliard
wrote:
> Ok, i'm going to contact the manufacturer directly then and see what they
> say.
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Marco Antonio Mauro
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Oct 18,
ppreciated.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
---
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi
b/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi
index e77d823..46a0e0c 100644
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi
+++ b/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
/ {
chosen {
- bootargs
I think my client mangled the patch. I will attach it to this email in
case I'm right.
dgn3500-factory-final.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Hi,
Can anyone check and apply it? Thanks!
--
Marcus905
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
ppreciated.
Resubmitted as attachment because of client mangling, patch is
identical to v1 wrt everything else.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
diff --git a/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi b/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.dtsi
index e77d823..46a0e0c 100644
--- a/target/linux/lantiq/dts/DGN3500.
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
> This patch adds factory image building so as to allow an OpenWRT
> install through the standard firmware update system.
>
> It is an heavily modified version of a package I found on the OpenWRT
> forum with a couple
A and
AnnexB-DE/GR.
I tested the patch successfully on my device.
This v3 fixes a bug in the checksum appending algorithm that made the
images unflashable if the checksum happened to be <0x1000 and another
bug that caused the pid signature to be written in the wrong place.
Signed-off-by: Marco
I don't see this patch in patchwork.
Can anyone check please?
If I have to resend it tell me and I will.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
7;t appear in patchwork, I'm sorry
for all the noise I caused in this list.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
--
dgn3500-factory-final-v3.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.o
Hi,
does anyone know how to interact with the dsl daemon via a cli to
query some extended data? I'd like to get a bit more data in the web
interface and the dsl_control status call.
Thanks!
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC
___
Hi,
the router I'm working on at the moment, the DGN3500 lantiq platform,
has a strange issue: it won't create or save the configuration. I see
this in the logs:
[0.00] Linux version 3.10.26 (marcus905@experiment) (gcc
version 4.6.4 (OpenWrt/Linaro GCC 4.6-2013.05 r39286) ) #39 Thu Feb 6
I think I found out the cause. The partition rootfs data gets created
after the squashfs one at 0x73 in my case, but there there's the
sercomm signature and checksum needed for the bootloader there, and
the deadc0de jffs2 magic is instead at 0x74, and that's where the
partition should start
pport all known
models directly, atm known variants are AnnexA-WW, AnnexA-NA and
AnnexB-DE/GR.
I tested the patch successfully on my device.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
dgn3500-factory-sysupgrade-final.patch
Description: Binary data
___
openwrt-
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
> I think I found out the cause. The partition rootfs data gets created
> after the squashfs one at 0x73 in my case, but there there's the
> sercomm signature and checksum needed for the bootloader there, and
> t
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
> This patch adds factory image building for the DGN3500, all variants,
> and fixes sysupgrade images to make them play nice with the sercomm
> secondary boot loader.
>
> The factory images can be used directly in the u
Hi
I have a Sitecom WL-341 and would like to know what was needed to run
OpenWRT on it.
It's Ralink based, with a RT3052F ASIC, has 4MB flash and 16MB ram
(upgradable to 32 or more, has space and components to accommodate
another TSOPII-54 (SDR?) SDRAM chip which pads are left not
populated), USB
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a Sitecom WL-341 and would like to know what was needed to run
> OpenWRT on it.
>
> It's Ralink based, with a RT3052F ASIC, has 4MB flash and 16MB ram
> (upgradable to 32 or more, has space and
pt for the lack of RAM.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
---
Index: target/linux/ramips/files/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x/Kconfig
===
--- target/linux/ramips/files/arch/mips/ralink/rt305x/Kconfig (revision 29835)
+++ target/linux/ra
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 21 January 2012 00:53, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
>> This patch adds support for the Sitecom WL-341 v3 and other Sercomm
>> IP1006RRv2 based boards for sysupgrade support and for the initial
>> flash through
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 22 January 2012 14:13, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Roman Yeryomin
>> wrote:
>>> On 21 January 2012 00:53, Marco Antonio Mauro wrote:
>>>> This patch adds support
tached and not inline to avoid mangling by my mail client.
This obsoletes and replaces my previous patch.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC
Index: target/linux/ramips/files/arch/mips/ralink/
tached and not inline to avoid mangling by my mail client.
This obsoletes and replaces my previous patch, which has a copypaste error.
Signed-off-by: Marco Antonio Mauro
--
Marcus905
GPG pubkey:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1FC0ECC932FE5FAC
Index: target/linux/ramips/f
Hello,
I'm trying to write a patch to add support for a new brcm63xx board. I
already posted in the forum (link:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=25578 ); there jow said I
should get in touch with florian through this mailing list.
How can I add support for that board? Which files need
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> You basically need to adapt arch/mips/bcm63xx/boards/board_bcm963xx.c and add
> a specific definition for your board, that is:
>
> - describing the expected CPU type it will be found running on
> - external peripherals which are present on
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> Hi Rafał,
>
> We have a 1.5 MB big version of the boradcom driver in version
> 5.10.56.27 on our servers [1]. If you do not exactly need version
> 5.10.56.51 this should help.
It would be nice if you also hosted a package for the slightly n
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Stefan Monnier
wrote:
>> This is assuming the theoretical story is correct in practice. In
>> practice, I've seen flashes (especially NAND, but also NOR) die a lot
>> sooner then that especially in cheap consumer hardware :(
>
> But these cases aren't avoided b
33 matches
Mail list logo
