Re: Calling all Econet (MIPS) SoC enthusiasts!

2025-02-14 Thread Caleb James DeLisle
Thank you Alex for bringing this up. Initial support (interrupt controller, clocksource, read-only flash support) is completed in https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17928 and is awaiting review. Regarding the PCI and USB, I think it's realistic to expect them fairly soon, as they seem to b

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2025-02-12 19:44, John Crispin

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Bas Mevissen via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On 2025-02-13 09:47, John Crispin

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Chuanhong Guo
Hi! On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 2:46 AM John Crispin wrote: > > Hi, > > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development > of OpenWrt "Two". > > "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following > upgrades. > > * MT7988 > * 10G SFP > * 5G copper > * 4 port 2.

Re: Calling all Econet (MIPS) SoC enthusiasts!

2025-02-14 Thread Enrico Mioso
Hello all!! I hope this work gets considered, also for the enthusiasm and because I think it can be really useful in the long term. Thanks for the effort. Enrico ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Eric via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- On Friday, February 14th, 2025 at

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread John Crispin
On 14.02.25 16:41, Eric via openwrt-devel wrote: Regarding the multiple SKUs, why not just have two like the One: a completed device, plug and play; a "kit" without a case, just board and maybe PSU, you supply everything else including antennas... it was a good idea but in reality ~6k units wer

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread David Lang
John Crispin wrote: * Tri-band Wi-Fi 7 Do you expect the design to include casing with internal antennas, or are you going for the hedgehog look? Ideally internal but no final conclusion yet, we will use the BE5000 2+3+3 design I don't see any reason why there can't be a couple different c

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread John Crispin
On 14.02.25 09:56, David Lang wrote: I don't see any reason why there can't be a couple different cases available, one with internal antennas and one with external antennas. (I've converted APs both ways for my own uses) two cases means two SKUs, then taking into account that we might need d

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread John Crispin
On 14.02.25 11:01, Rui Salvaterra wrote: Daniel was concerned about the MediaTek's PPE not recognising the MaxLinear DSA tags, when I chatted with him, but it seems there won't be any issues. the PPE works with the switch using 1q special tags ___ o

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Shengyu Qu
Hi, Will the WIFI hardware have dedicated FEMs? Also, more SFPs would be better. Best regards, Shengyu ___ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Shengyu Qu
Hi, Maybe we can have a differernt version that switch that rtl phy to a SFP+ cage? This would bring more flexibility and also higher speed. 5gbps phy would be hot and requires more expensive RJ45 cable. If using SFP+ cage, we can use LC/SC fiber modules rather than rj45. Also, since MT7988 has

Re: [VOTE] OpenWrt Two

2025-02-14 Thread Rui Salvaterra
[Replying to all this time] Hi, John, On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 18:46, John Crispin wrote: > > Hi, > > starting a [VOTE] to get approval allowing me to begin the development > of OpenWrt "Two". > > "Two" will have all of the features that "One" has with the following > upgrades. > > * MT7988 > * 10

[Pull Request] New Platform: EcoNet EN75xx MIPS

2025-02-14 Thread Alex Kyr via openwrt-devel
The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header. To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped automatically by the mailing list software.--- Begin Message --- @All project maintainers - please