Hi John,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 8:56 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>
>
> On 14/06/2015 23:56, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * WEIO Web Of Things Platform
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Drasko DRASKOVIC and Uros PETREVSKI
>> + *
>> + * ## ## ###
>> + *
* Hendrik [15.06.2015 09:02]:
> i just wanted to ask for your oppinions on the second verison of my
> patch.
why didnt you pay attention for all the suggestions? bye, bastian
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.o
Add features ext4 targz to target x86/xen_domu in order to
generate images in defconfig.
This fixes #18074.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
---
target/linux/x86/xen_domu/target.mk | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/linux/x86/xen_domu/target.mk
b
OK, Sent the PR in order to remove it.
I already have a update patch that I'll send to list.
However, I guess that perf pkg maintainer (or other) should
be the one to keep the maintenance as I have no current uses
for elfutils and probably I'll not give the love it desires.
---
Luiz Angelo D
Besides source.tgz, 001-elfutils-portability.patch (provided by upstream
project) where updated.
Other patches where updated to fix hulk warnings and minor conflicts.
Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
---
package/libs/elfutils/Makefile |4 +-
.../patches/001-elfut
Am 2015-06-15 09:17, schrieb Bastian Bittorf:
* Hendrik [15.06.2015 09:02]:
i just wanted to ask for your oppinions on the second verison of my
patch.
why didnt you pay attention for all the suggestions? bye, bastian
After the discussion on the list this was what I thought was the state
of
Hi H01gi,
just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproducible_builds&id=3373ffd07e016ae1a81d12cb246fc6787f0bdbe1
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproducible_builds&i
Thanks, applied to trunk and CC.
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
Hello,
The first boot, after flashing a new image, runs fine.
I edit my /etc/config/network configuration then reboot and I get
those errors (every reboot):
[8.13] jffs2: jffs2_scan_inode_node(): CRC failed on node at
0x0046000c: Read 0x, calculated 0x4900568b
...
... (many times)
On 2015-06-15 10:20, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On 7 May 2015 at 15:49, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-07 08:01, Wojciech Dubowik wrote:
Try to boot with kernel locking enabled. I have seen jffs2 deadlocks on
readdir. As far as
Hi,
On Montag, 15. Juni 2015, John Crispin wrote:
> just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproduci
> ble_builds&id=3373ffd07e016ae1a81d12cb246fc6787f0bdbe1
> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reprodu
On 15/06/2015 10:50, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Montag, 15. Juni 2015, John Crispin wrote:
>> just for the record here are some of the links that are relevant...
>>
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/dpkg.git/commit/?h=pu/reproduci
>> ble_builds&id=3373ffd07e016ae1a81d12cb246f
Hi Karl,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Karl Palsson wrote:
>
> A lot of this messes up the alphabetical ordering.
Can you point me to exact spots?
I tried to add WeIO support next to Carambola2, as in many cases it is
practically the same. I might be that I did not notice alphabetical
order
Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Karl Palsson
> wrote:
> >
> > A lot of this messes up the alphabetical ordering.
>
> Can you point me to exact spots?
>
> I tried to add WeIO support next to Carambola2, as in many cases it is
> practically the same. I m
I created my first build from the brand-new CC15.05 chaos_calmer branch. I
patched include/version.mk to get the version right, but no other changes
were needed.
The build is otherwise ok, but opkg does not accept package list signatures
from the 15.05-rc2 directory. When I try opkg update, I
On 15 June 2015 at 15:52, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:24:28AM +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2015-06-15 10:20, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> >> On 7 May 2015 at 15:49, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> >>> On 2015-05-07 08:01
This gets more curious... You are certainly correct that the strings passed to
procd are marshaled correctly. It turns out that the shells I have tried to pass
the numeric-colon-separated list as an option value gets the list split apart as
I noted earlier. Barring any quick solution to this iss
On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> Tested on UAP-PRO
>
Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
I will send rebased version.
Regards,
Roman
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.or
On 7 June 2015 at 15:27, Alexander Couzens wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens
> ---
> target/linux/ar71xx/image/Makefile | 264
> -
> 1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
At least UAP-PRO image is broken after this (applied in 45983):
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> > Tested on UAP-PRO
> >
>
> Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
> I will send rebased version.
Yes, I saw that and manually fixed it to test on TL-WDR3500.
Apart fro
On 15 June 2015 at 19:09, Daniel Golle wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:15:58PM +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 14 June 2015 at 20:15, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> > Tested on UAP-PRO
>> >
>>
>> Please discard this, it's broken because of 45954.
>> I will send rebased version.
>
> Yes, I saw th
Hi,
I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt
trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while.
Some packages might still be broken, so please test and open up bug
reports for any issues that you find.
Please remember to open up trac tickets only for
Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 6:24 PM Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just committed a change making musl the new default libc in OpenWrt
> trunk, replacing uclibc. We've been preparing this for quite a while.
> Some packages mi
I wonder why in https://dev.openwrt.org/changeset/35012 the choice was
made to use the firewall to prevent ULA destination addresses from
trying to be reached on the WAN vs. using routing rules and
"unreachable" routes. Something like:
unreachable fc00::/7 dev lo metric 1024 error -128
in the
On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
Read again: "in OpenWrt trunk"
___
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:37 PM Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 16 June 2015 at 01:31, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> > Just to clarify, this is only for trunk, not for the CC branch, correct?
>
> Read again: "in OpenWrt trunk"
>
Sometimes, even apparently obvious things are important enough to be stated
That commit got reverted 4 months later and was never really in use for
long. Source-Destination routing has been used to replace it for egress
traffic, i.e. there are simply no external (e.g. default) routes that
have a matching source-restriction.
For ingress traffic the stateful firewall handle
27 matches
Mail list logo
