Hi and sorry John and all other that i could have offended.
That was really not the goal of my mail, and me being a bit tired and not
so good in english,
i wrote an awful rant without noticing.
Thanks for all the work that you are doing. I know that you and other are
working hard
to provide us the
Hello everyone !
Relax :) If we are reading this list it is because we all want a
better OpenWrt, and we all do the best we can for it.
Etienne in my experience the OpenWrt group is really open. The problem
is the that core people have to face thousands of contacts over the
Internet from unknown
Hi all,
While we all agree that the OpenWRT core developers are doing great
work, are really busy, and sometimes it's more important to fix a bug
that to send an email, I think Etienne raises a valid point here:
communication could be better and the project management could be more
open...
For ex
John Crispin writes:
> we noticed that qmi is not working properly today and are working on a fix.
>
> John
>
> On 01/10/2014 21:12, Spam Catcher wrote:
>> I'm trying to use uqmi with a Sierra Wireless MC7354 and MC7750. On
>> both modules I'm able to bring up a connection to the cell netw
On 2014-10-01 21:12, Spam Catcher wrote:
> I'm trying to use uqmi with a Sierra Wireless MC7354 and MC7750. On
> both modules I'm able to bring up a connection to the cell network, but
> cannot send or receive anything on the wwan0 interface. After much
> digging I found an option for libqmi that
Apparently yes, Bruno. Just asking for more communication while at the same
time even commending the devs for their hard work, as Etienne did, seems to
justify being insulted.
Personal sensibilities aside this has been a bone of contention for a long
time. Here just a couple of examples:
https://l
Really, John?
Personal insults through direct emails?
On 2 October 2014 18:14, John Crispin wrote:
> until now i considered you "one of the reliable crowd" and just
> reasserted to "yet another troll"
>
>
> On 02/10/2014 07:01, Hanno Schupp wrote:
> > I think this is his point, mate: You work ha
On 02.10.2014 12:21, Hanno Schupp wrote:
> For example, I did not know that "BB-final binaries have been online for
> over a day"... is it really too much to ask to send a short note about a
> major release to the mailing list?
exactly Etiennes point, correct and valid as opposed to uncivilized co
On 2014-10-02 11:06, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While we all agree that the OpenWRT core developers are doing great
> work, are really busy, and sometimes it's more important to fix a bug
> that to send an email, I think Etienne raises a valid point here:
> communication could be better an
> "Nishant" == Nishant Sharma writes:
Nishant> [...] I never did a clean or dir clean but yes I enabled a
Nishant> few packages and modules with new requirements.
Nishant> Which is fine by my own thinking. And just for adding
Nishant> e.g. batman-adv to existing devices in the field, it beco
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Alpha Sparc wrote:
How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ?
The focus of CeroWrt is on reducing latency, not increasing throughput. If you
run into really badd bufferbloat problems without these scrips, then these
scripts can result more more 'goodput'
John,
Please mind your manners and keep the discussion at a professional level. I
doubt Etienne wanted to insult you or criticize your work, and it's true that
we did not announce of the availability of final binaries yet.
Imre
On Thu, 02 Oct 2014 07:30:41 +0200, John Crispin wrote:
no i
One thing I have observed is that some developers are on the TRAC system and
actively looking at tickets, while others are purely on the mailing list and
do not regularly (or at all) look at the TRAC system.
This can cause confusion and frustration for some who are wanting to report
a bug, and rep
On 2014-10-02 11:22, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-10-01 21:12, Spam Catcher wrote:
>> I'm trying to use uqmi with a Sierra Wireless MC7354 and MC7750. On
>> both modules I'm able to bring up a connection to the cell network, but
>> cannot send or receive anything on the wwan0 interface. After mu
My first email was wrong, and i don't want to criticize anybody work, don't
want to insult anybody,
and really don't want to start a war.
Apologies again
2014-10-02 13:55 GMT+02:00 Imre Kaloz :
> John,
>
> Please mind your manners and keep the discussion at a professional level.
> I doubt Etienn
When a shell script call is finished, proto_shell_task_finish( ) is
called to monitor processes, and determine the next interface state.
When the interface is brought up after a reconfiguration from dhcp
to static, it will first try to (erroneously?) reconfigure the
interface for DHCP. Upon doing
Ubox logs various messages during OpenWRT boot which are not
very interesting, such as the number of iterations made. This
fix implements several loglevels for debug/info/error so that
more useful messages are shown.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
kmodloader.c | 75 ++
SIGINT is captured by uloop by default. This does not work for
procd, where SIGINT is used by the kernel to indicate that the
system must be rebooted.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
uloop.c | 24 +---
uloop.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --g
Hi Gui,
this is not supposed to happen though - you can see the magic in
include/kernel-defaults.mk - define Kernel/Configure/Default
The hash is calculated like that:
grep '=[ym]' .../.config | sort | md5sum
Can you diff the Kernel build_dir/target-*/linux-*/linux-*/.config file
before and a
Procd, up until now, did not support the ctrlaltdel handler. Thus,
the system would immediately reboot upon the three-finger salute,
and no shutdown scripts would be run. This patch adds the handler
for the /etc/inittab entry, so that /sbin/reboot can be run and
in turn the shutdown scripts can be
When keeping ctrl-alt-del pressed, or when running;
while true; do
/sbin/reboot
done
effectively the procd shutdown cycle gets into an undefined state,
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
state.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/state.c b/state.c
inde
It has been observed that, very rarely, the system does not reboot
when procd enters the shutdown state. Busybox seems to have an
obscure fix in its shutdown, where the parent (procd) process
is put in an infinite loop, and a special child is executed to
execute reboot(). This may very well be the
procd has the habit of logging startup/shutdown via
rcS to syslog, which is pointless in case of a
shutdown, and unlikely to be complete on a startup
(as syslog is not running). Write to /dev/console
instead.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
rcS.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+),
The problem was caused by procd not opening /dev/tty* (which ever was specified
in
/etc/inittab), causing /proc/PID/fd to point to /console instead. /dev/console
is a
non-controlling tty (CTTY), and cannot be used as one, which is exactly what
curses
applications want. Since this is very likely
On x86, pressing the scrolllock button may effectively prevent procd from
rebooting
the system. This happens because procd tries to write to /dev/console, which in
that
situation is blocked, effectively blocking procd from rebooting the system.
This patch puts procd's stderr access into non-bloc
Procd as it currently is does not kill the running processes during shutdown.
As this might cause undesired behaviour, this should be implemented.
Implementation was taken from busybox 1.19.4
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
state.c | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s
While executing a system halt (via the powerbutton or otherwise),
the system displays rebooting, whereas it should display that
it is going to turn off.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
state.c | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/state.c b/state.c
index 2268de3.
The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the final release
of OpenWrt Barrier Breaker.
___ __
| |.-.-.-.| | | |..| |_
| - || _ | -__| || | | || _|| _|
|___|| __|_|__|__||||__| ||
procd by default writes to /dev/console. When rebooting, this means that the
terminal on which the reboot sequence was started will not see what is going
on. This patch fixes that by reopening stdin, stdout and stderr to /dev/tty0
upon reboot.
Also, due to (probably) pivot-root, /proc/1/fd shows 1
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/libs/toolchain/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/toolchain/Makefile b/package/libs/toolchain/Makefile
index 36cf8c4..72ce6b9 100644
--- a/package/libs/toolchain/Makefile
+++ b/package/libs/toolchain/Mak
A message:
uinteger - 9 = true
is displayed during boot. This is the result of the validate_data
command checking the cron log level. As the output is not
interesting, only the result, filter...
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/utils/busybox/files/cron | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+
Hello,
just got this mini router and it's so small and neat!
Unfortunately it seems i cannot generate images with it using BB but
people on the forum say it's similar to the tp-link mr3040:
https://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=45167
I tried to patch my BB toolchain with the modifications
Early during bootup, kmodloader is started which loads the drivers
in /etc/modules.d. Unfortunately at this time the system script has
not run yet, which is supposed to set the console log level.
Having the S10system script moved to an earlier time is not an
option, as this in turn will not work be
During boot, a not found message is displayed for systems which do
not have uci 'network.globals.ula_prefix' defined in
/etc/config/network. The error message itself is not used and can
be ignored.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/base-files/files/etc/uci-defaults/12_network-generate-ula |
When 'wifi down' is called by /etc/init.d/network, it is run from
stop_service( ). This function is in turn invoked from stop( ).
stop( ) messes up the order by first procd_kill-ing the network
settings, then calling wifi to down the wifi networking
interfaces. By redefining stop( ) instead, the pr
A big thank and many congratulations!
Cheers,
Nishant
On 2 October 2014 18:29:08 GMT+05:30, Steven Barth wrote:
>The OpenWrt developers are proud to announce the final release
>of OpenWrt Barrier Breaker.
>
> ___ __
> | |.-.-.-.| |
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh
b/package/kernel/mac80211/files/lib/wifi/mac80211.sh
index a3b2199..2af4dc5 100644
--- a/packag
From: Tjalling Hattink
Instead throw an -EILSEQ error.
Signed-off-by: Tjalling Hattink
---
package/libs/libiconv/src/iconv.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/libs/libiconv/src/iconv.c
b/package/libs/libiconv/src/iconv.c
index cb4e947..d2e19e3
From: Tjalling Hattink
Otherwise the modpost steps for individual modules that are compiled manually
(using make package//install) will give warning of missing
symbols when that module depends other modules.
This is caused by the Module.symvers file not containing any symbols anymore
of external
Allow discovery protocols to be disabled from menuconfig
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/network/services/lldpd/Config.in | 28 +
package/network/services/lldpd/Makefile| 47 --
.../lldpd/patches/002-no-stack-protector.patch | 5 +
Send a netlink call to leave the mesh when meshd exits
Make hunting-and-pecking loop (more) resistant to side channel attack
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
package/network/services/authsae/Makefile | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/package/network/services/a
Some clients have a very short timeout for sending the DHCP
DISCOVER, shorter than the arpping timeout of 2000 milliseconds
that udhcpd uses by default.
This patch allows tweaking the timeout, or disabling of arpping
altogether, at the risk of handing out addresses which are
already in use.
Signe
The scripts were based on the netifd dhcp scripts,
and should add zeroconf support to /etc/config/network
Example:
config interface 'lan'
option ifname 'eth0'
option auto '0'
option proto 'zeroconf'
Optionally, the desired IP address can be added by:
option
zcip is not the most talkative beast at the best of times. It
would be nice to see -something- in syslog when an IP address
is acquired.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
.../netifd/files/lib/netifd/proto/zeroconf.sh | 2 +-
.../busybox/patches/460-zcip-always-syslog.patch | 44
169.254 may be used by local networks. This patch allows specifying
your own IP range.
Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
---
.../busybox/patches/450-zcip-own-ip-range.patch| 110 +
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/utils/busybox/patches/450-zcip-own-i
Hi all,
I have just tested BB Final on a 1043ND-v1 to observe a possible issue
I've seen a while ago.
This device has 3 antennae but I want to use only one port (a Sector
antenna) so I set the following on my /etc/config/wireless which means
only the first antenna port (4 = 100 in binary).
Just one minor inline,
Cheers,
Karl P
On 10/02/2014 12:42 PM, Michel Stam wrote:
Ubox logs various messages during OpenWRT boot which are not
very interesting, such as the number of iterations made. This
fix implements several loglevels for debug/info/error so that
more useful messages are sho
Hi Weedy,
On Oct 2, 2014, at 05:46 , Alpha Sparc wrote:
> How good is the throughput on CeroWrt compared to OpenWrt ?
I assume you are talking about the pure routing performance with no
firewall/NAT and traffic-shaping involved? I think they pretty much are equal
(pretty much the same
Hey Karl,
I agree that verbose in the macro would be an option, although by then
you're re-implementing the syslog priorities in macros.
Also, currently the verbose argument is only used in deps_available( ),
which would mean implementing the verbose parameter throughout the
kmodloader.c source.
Adds IPIP tunnel support to netifd.
Following IPIP tunnel parameters can be configured :
-peeraddr (IPv4 remote address)
-ipaddr (IPv4 local address)
-mtu (IPIP tunnel mtu)
-ttl (time to live of encapsulting packets)
-tos (type of service either inherit (outer header inherits the val
The package supports IP in IP by registering the ipip protocol handler
Following options are configurable
-peeraddr (IPv4 remote address)
-ipaddr (IPv4 local address)
-ttl (time to live of encapsulating packet)
-tos (type of service of encapsulating packet either inherit (outer hea
Hi Michel,
On 02.10.2014 15:24, Michel Stam wrote:
> During boot, a not found message is displayed for systems which do
> not have uci 'network.globals.ula_prefix' defined in
> /etc/config/network. The error message itself is not used and can
> be ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
> ---
>
Just an idea when I saw that deps_available line. I've not looked at the code
in any detail.
Cheers,
Karl P
On 10/02/2014 02:24 PM, Stam, Michel [FINT] wrote:
Hey Karl,
I agree that verbose in the macro would be an option, although by then
you're re-implementing the syslog priorities in ma
Tos support is added as a string parameter which can have the following values :
-inherit (outer header inherits the tos value of the inner header)
-hex value
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker
---
package/network/ipv6/6rd/files/6rd.sh | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions
Tos support is added as a string parameter which can have the following values :
-inherit (outer header inherits the tos value of the inner header)
-hex value
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker
---
package/network/ipv6/6in4/files/6in4.sh | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-
Tos support is added as a string parameter which can have the following values :
-inherit (outer header inherits the tos value of the inner header)
-hex value
Signed-off-by: Hans Dedecker
---
package/network/ipv6/6to4/files/6to4.sh | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-
Hello all,
A while back i have created a ticket
(https://dev.openwrt.org/ticket/17609) detailing kernel 3.14.x failure
to boot on ar71xx (wndr3700v4 router) platform. Today i have
successfully used serial console attached to the router and got a boot
log which shows a wrong checksum of kernel imag
My bad, sorry i have pasted wrong file (like an imbecile) :D, here is
the correct output:
U-Boot 1.1.4 (Jun 21 2012 - 11:09:33)
DNI HW ID: 29763948 flash 128MB RAM 128MB U-boot dni29 V1.8
DRAM: 128 MB
Atheros on-chip NAND FLash Controller Driver, Version 0.1 (c) 2010
Atheros Communications, Lt
On 2014-10-02 15:41, Michel Stam wrote:
> 169.254 may be used by local networks. This patch allows specifying
> your own IP range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Stam
Could you please also submit this and the other patch to busybox upstream?
Thanks,
- Felix
__
59 matches
Mail list logo
